Description
Zac Medico
2010-01-07 19:34:07 UTC
*** Bug 1343 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 260353 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** uhh, wait. How does a bug filed in 2002 *BECOME* a duplicate of a bug filed eight years later? Shouldn't the new bug be marked a duplicate of the old bug? Is there any method to this madness of just methodical madness? (hey, I like that one, "methodical madness", I gotta remember that one.....) And yes, I'm referring to bug #1343 that has had 65 bugs marked a duplicate of it. (In reply to comment #3) That bug was being used as a sort of tracker bug. We're using this one instead now. Deal with it. |