Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 372989 - stabilize x11-terms/terminal-0.4.8 (was: 0.4.6 is slow after updating vte to 0.28.1-r200)
Summary: stabilize x11-terms/terminal-0.4.8 (was: 0.4.6 is slow after updating vte to ...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: XFCE Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
: 372797 373063 373315 373459 374511 375399 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: CVE-2011-2198
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-06-25 13:46 UTC by Thomas Petersen
Modified: 2011-10-18 16:18 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Thomas Petersen 2011-06-25 13:46:08 UTC
vte-0.28.1-r200 has just become stable on x86. After updating vte terminal-0.4.6 becomes slow and consumes much cpu power even when idle.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open a terminal.
2. Make it larger (for greater effect).
Actual Results:  
Check cpu consumption with top. Terminal and X are consuming a great deal.

Expected Results:  
Terminal should consume close to 0% cpu power.

Updating to x11-terms/terminal-0.4.8 seems to fix the problem.

I haven't tested on amd64 as vte-0.28.1-r200 is not yet stable on amd64.
Comment 1 Fab 2011-06-25 18:50:40 UTC
Confirming same bahavior here on stable x86. Upgrading x11-terms/terminal to 0.4.8 fixed the issue.
Comment 2 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-06-27 09:05:43 UTC
*** Bug 372797 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-06-27 09:06:42 UTC
Please stabilize latest terminal if possible then
Comment 4 Christoph Mende (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-06-27 10:07:24 UTC
0.4.7 works too, but .8 is required for gtk+-2.24 anyway, so let's go for that.
do you want to handle it in the security bug? if not, feel free to CC arches.
Comment 5 Christoph Mende (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-06-27 11:04:13 UTC
as discussed on IRC,
arches please mark stable terminal-0.4.8
Comment 6 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-06-27 18:12:18 UTC
*** Bug 373063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Oleg Mikheev 2011-06-29 11:49:31 UTC
if terminal 0.4.8 is not ready for stable then 0.4.6 I believe could be fixed by applying this patch from upstream:
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6921#c9
Comment 8 Christoph Mende (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-06-29 14:42:46 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> if terminal 0.4.8 is not ready for stable then 0.4.6 I believe could be fixed
> by applying this patch from upstream:
> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6921#c9

I already said it is and additionally it'd also require the gtk 2.24 patch.
Comment 9 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-06-29 17:11:40 UTC
*** Bug 373315 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-06-29 17:11:54 UTC
*** Bug 373459 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-07-09 07:08:26 UTC
*** Bug 374511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2011-07-10 10:35:50 UTC
arm stable
Comment 13 David Abbott (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-07-16 18:42:20 UTC
Arch tested on x86, all good here ...
Comment 14 Matt Beswick (Soir) 2011-07-16 21:41:43 UTC
*** Bug 375399 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-07-24 13:01:01 UTC
ppc/ppc64 stable
Comment 16 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-08-04 21:36:47 UTC
x86 stable, thanks David
Comment 17 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-10-11 19:18:28 UTC
Stable for HPPA.
Comment 18 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-10-12 13:33:43 UTC
alpha/ia64/sparc stable