Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 114798 - "cannot resolve virtual package name to an ebuild" errors in <2.0.51.20
Summary: "cannot resolve virtual package name to an ebuild" errors in <2.0.51.20
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High blocker
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 114829 114910 114934 115104 115325 115343 115457 115534 115936 115942 116060 116065 116168 116390 116396 116408 116461 116522 116544 116556 116572 116621 116664 116675 116717 116839 116883 116904 116969 117039 117069 117113 117164 117241 117248 117301 117359 117404 117689 117721 117730 117779 117880 117905 118129 118352 118548 118596 118597 118602 118617 118618 118641 118764 118843 118944 118949 119011 119044 119157 119207 119225 119681 119749 119834 119922 120060 120124 120251 120424 virtual/x11-6.8 120457 120594 120755 120786 120804 120886 120909 120944 121070 121072 121096 121227 121304 121323 121472 121627 121677 121691 121748 121903 122112 122132 122255 122313 122330 122364 122422 122472 122504 122544 122695 122719 122918 122937 122975 123020 123122 123243 123300 123441 123473 123548 123612 123701 123730 123788 123914 124097 124294 124369 124586 124713 124798 125008 125058 125092 125541 125739 126308 126576 126746 126887 126952 127055 127212 127250 127551 127857 127967 127999 128110 128279 128516 128724 128757 128898 129049 129078 129291 129403 129484 129899 131043 131241 131251 131904 132724 132933 132991 133073 133315 133388 133577 134056 134278 134286 134316 134548 134708 139111 139680 140408 141646 144708 145600 145752 145865 147288 147460 149456 155737 156794 166579 170151 173719 177090 178666 184841 185671 186593 189006 193125 199906 203973 212897 217969 222579 ada-1995 230029 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-12-07 13:57 UTC by Manuel Traut
Modified: 2008-06-29 15:33 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
results of emerge --info (emerge-info.txt,2.45 KB, text/plain)
2006-07-23 12:34 UTC, Stephen George
Details
results of uname -a (my sysinfo) (uname-a.txt,135 bytes, text/plain)
2006-07-23 12:35 UTC, Stephen George
Details
the error outputted after running emerge --sync (emerge-output.txt,52.62 KB, text/plain)
2006-07-23 12:35 UTC, Stephen George
Details
results of sysctl -a (my sys info) (sysctl.txt,10.42 KB, text/plain)
2006-07-23 12:35 UTC, Stephen George
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Manuel Traut 2005-12-07 13:57:15 UTC
Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an
ebuild. !!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8)

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge sync
2. wait :-)

Actual Results:  
Portage is incorrect :-(

Expected Results:  
i think you know...
Comment 1 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-08 01:16:54 UTC
This is not a bug in x11, this is a bug in whatever ebuild depends on a
versioned virtual.
Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-08 01:24:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is not a bug in x11, this is a bug in whatever ebuild depends on a
> versioned virtual.

shrug... there's no such ebuild or eclass in portage that would depend on
virtual/x11-6.8; so either the user has some crap in overlay or the problem is
somewhere else.
Comment 3 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-08 01:51:58 UTC
I'll give it to the portage guys then. Indeed, I checked:

donnie@supernova /usr/local/share/gentoo-x86 $ find ./ -name '*.ebuild' | xargs
-n1000 grep virtual/x11-6
donnie@supernova /usr/local/share/gentoo-x86 $
Comment 4 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-08 03:02:55 UTC
*** Bug 114829 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Jason Stubbs (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-08 04:44:06 UTC
Portage versions prior to 2.0.51.20 (which was released almost 8 months ago) 
will have this problem.    
Comment 6 Jordi Yeh 2005-12-08 08:52:03 UTC
I had the same problem.

For newbies,

After the

...
wrote 681 bytes  read 3358865 bytes  21062.98 bytes/sec
total size is 107648311  speedup is 32.04

>>> Updating Portage cache:   88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an
ebuild.
!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8)

Do the following

#emerge --av portage
#emerge --sync

This fixes the issue for me as per Jason Stubbs comment.

Thanks
Comment 7 Stephen Bennett (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-08 13:54:23 UTC
*** Bug 114910 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-08 16:40:41 UTC
*** Bug 114934 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 dick detweiler 2005-12-08 16:54:11 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an
> ebuild. !!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8)
> 
> Reproducible: Always
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. emerge sync
> 2. wait :-)
> 
> Actual Results:  
> Portage is incorrect :-(
> 
> Expected Results:  
> i think you know...



(In reply to comment #0)
> Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an
> ebuild. !!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8)
> 
> Reproducible: Always
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. emerge sync
> 2. wait :-)
> 
> Actual Results:  
> Portage is incorrect :-(
> 
> Expected Results:  
> i think you know...

In reply to comment #6

'emerge --av portage' is an invalid option on my system.  ??
Comment 10 Tom Lanyon 2005-12-08 18:05:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
>
> In reply to comment #6
> 
> 'emerge --av portage' is an invalid option on my system.  ??

Try 'emerge -av portage'.


And, yes, upgrading to portage-2.0.51.22-r3 from 2.0.51-r3, then syncing my
portage tree fixed the problem for me. :)

Thanks,
Tom
Comment 11 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2005-12-10 09:44:40 UTC
*** Bug 115104 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 johaBBa 2005-12-10 13:11:54 UTC
Re-emerging/updating portage and running emerge --sync did fix the problem for
me on a new 2005.1 install. Not sure if I should paste my long forum post with
system details: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-410139.html.

Here is my emerge --info which I didn't put in the post

Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/x86/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2,
2.6.14-gentoo-r4 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.14-gentoo-r4 i686 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.66GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5-r2, 2.4.2
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.12
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.20
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-Os -march=pentium4 -pipe -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-Os -march=pentium4 -pipe -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://prometheus.cs.wmich.edu/gentoo 
http://cudlug.cudenver.edu/gentoo/"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X acpi alsa apache2 avi berkdb bitmap-fonts bzip2 cdr cdrom chroot
crypt divx4linux dvd eds emboss encode expat fortran gdbm gif gstreamer gtk gtk2
imlib jpeg libg++ libwww mad maildir mikmod motif mp3 mpeg mplayer mysql ncurses
nls offensive ogg oggvorbis openal opengl oss pam pcap pcre pda pdf pdflib perl
php png pthreads python quicktime readline real sdl spell ssl svg tcltk tcpd
tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev usb v4l v4l2 vorbis win32codecs
xml2 xmms xrandr xv xvid yahoo zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY
Comment 13 johaBBa 2005-12-10 13:16:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #12)
> Re-emerging/updating portage and running emerge --sync did fix the problem for

sorry...should be it did NOT fix the problem.
Comment 14 tuxxman 2005-12-10 21:58:58 UTC
Number of files: 131265
Number of files transferred: 16488
Total file size: 107417653 bytes
Total transferred file size: 25432340 bytes
Literal data: 25432340 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
File list size: 3040640
Total bytes written: 329941
Total bytes read: 29216654

wrote 329941 bytes  read 29216654 bytes  245199.96 bytes/sec
total size is 107417653  speedup is 3.64

>>> Updating Portage cache:   88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an
ebuild.
!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8)
Comment 15 Don Bishop 2005-12-12 07:04:54 UTC
I found that the /etc/make.profile link was pointing to the wrong place.  Should
have been (in my case):
/etc/make.profile -> /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1
(was pointing to /2004.3 or something, I forget now...)
This has happened to me before in other system-level upgrades
Comment 16 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-12 10:28:11 UTC
*** Bug 115325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-12 13:04:42 UTC
*** Bug 115343 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-13 13:46:16 UTC
*** Bug 115457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-14 07:36:03 UTC
*** Bug 115534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Jason Stubbs (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-17 03:05:35 UTC
Are there still issues? There doesn't seem to be...
Comment 21 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-18 07:07:32 UTC
*** Bug 115936 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2005-12-18 11:25:42 UTC
*** Bug 115942 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-19 10:36:36 UTC
*** Bug 116065 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-19 10:37:07 UTC
*** Bug 116060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-20 06:09:14 UTC
*** Bug 116168 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 Bruno Roggeri 2005-12-20 16:33:31 UTC
I just had same problem on a x86 machine I had not updated since quite a long time (~ 6 months ), but with virtual/libstdc++-3.3 . Updating portage (it was 2.0.51.19 I believe) fixed the problem. Is it the same bug or should I file a new one ?
Comment 27 Jason Stubbs (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-20 16:38:44 UTC
Same bug..
Comment 28 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2005-12-22 11:40:17 UTC
*** Bug 116408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2005-12-22 16:28:18 UTC
*** Bug 116408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Jason Stubbs (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-22 18:05:40 UTC
Are all these duplicates coming from people still running earlier than 2.0.51.20?
Comment 31 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-23 02:08:12 UTC
*** Bug 116461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-23 11:53:10 UTC
*** Bug 116522 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 33 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-23 14:52:10 UTC
*** Bug 116544 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 34 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-23 17:08:14 UTC
*** Bug 116556 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 35 Rick Jenkins 2005-12-23 17:15:26 UTC
My duplicate (very embarrasing) is portage 2.0.51.19
Comment 36 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-24 02:49:36 UTC
*** Bug 116572 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-24 11:40:43 UTC
*** Bug 116621 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 38 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-25 03:32:00 UTC
*** Bug 116664 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 39 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-25 03:45:03 UTC
*** Bug 116675 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 40 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-25 14:10:51 UTC
*** Bug 116717 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 41 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-26 23:05:05 UTC
*** Bug 116839 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 42 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-27 08:24:15 UTC
*** Bug 116883 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 43 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2005-12-27 11:18:31 UTC
*** Bug 116904 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 44 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-28 05:11:00 UTC
*** Bug 116969 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 45 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-28 17:57:24 UTC
*** Bug 117039 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 46 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-29 04:36:59 UTC
*** Bug 117069 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 47 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-29 12:37:40 UTC
*** Bug 117113 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 48 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-30 01:33:55 UTC
*** Bug 117164 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 49 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-30 17:11:14 UTC
*** Bug 117241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 50 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-31 00:37:11 UTC
*** Bug 117248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 51 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-12-31 16:05:06 UTC
*** Bug 117301 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 52 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-01-01 09:36:37 UTC
*** Bug 117359 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 53 Donald J. Axel 2006-01-01 13:28:05 UTC
I did emerge sync:

>>> Updating Portage cache:   90%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an ebuild.
!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/libstdc++-3.3)

I was updating a Gentoo (chroot'ed) partition which has not
been used since Feb 28, 2005. The /etc/make.profile link was dangling
after emerge sync.

This one solves after updating portage.
Thank you to developers and users for the dialogue on this bug-report.

Comment 54 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-01-01 16:40:01 UTC
*** Bug 117404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 55 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-01-02 09:07:43 UTC
this bug is fixed, so I will close it.  Users: if you hit this you need to emerge -u portage.
Comment 56 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-04 01:31:29 UTC
*** Bug 117689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 57 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-04 04:02:36 UTC
*** Bug 117721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 58 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-04 05:13:21 UTC
*** Bug 117730 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 59 morley.jonathan 2006-01-04 07:02:47 UTC
emerge -u portage did not work got halfway and stopped, synced again and message saying that:

ARCH is not set... Are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink?
!!! Is the symlink correct ?  Is your portage tree complete?

now emerge does not work at all except by reloading the snapshot off the live CD but that sends me round in circles
Comment 60 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-01-04 13:15:52 UTC
*** Bug 117779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 61 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-05 05:44:20 UTC
*** Bug 117880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 62 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-05 09:26:09 UTC
*** Bug 117905 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 63 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-06 20:06:24 UTC
*** Bug 118129 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 64 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-09 01:18:40 UTC
*** Bug 118352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 65 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-10 09:43:49 UTC
*** Bug 118548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 66 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-01-10 17:02:27 UTC
*** Bug 118596 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 67 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-01-10 17:09:22 UTC
*** Bug 118597 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 68 Paul Varner (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-10 18:54:34 UTC
*** Bug 118602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 69 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-10 21:03:51 UTC
*** Bug 118617 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 70 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-10 21:04:20 UTC
*** Bug 118618 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 71 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-11 06:57:10 UTC
*** Bug 118641 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 72 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-12 03:59:18 UTC
*** Bug 116396 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 73 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-12 04:02:19 UTC
*** Bug 116390 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 74 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-12 04:37:01 UTC
*** Bug 118764 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 75 Wiktor Wandachowicz 2006-01-12 04:54:14 UTC
Well, for me it's:
(I've already corrected the dangling symlink for /etc/make.profile)

# emerge --info
Portage 2.0.51.19 (default-linux/sparc/sparc64/2005.1, gcc-3.3.5-20050130, glibc-2.3.3.20040420-r2, 2.4.27 sparc64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.4.27 sparc64 sun4u
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.4-r1 [2.3.4 (#1, Apr  2 2005, 06:26:50)]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.4-r1
sys-apps/sandbox:    [Not Present]
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.59-r6, 2.13
sys-devel/automake:  1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.5, 1.4_p6, 1.6.3, 1.9.4
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r7
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.10-r4
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1-r4
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="sparc"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O2 -mcpu=ultrasparc"
CHOST="sparc-unknown-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -mcpu=ultrasparc"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://src.gentoo.pl http://gentoo.inode.at http://gentoo.netnitco.net"
LANG="pl_PL"
LC_ALL="pl_PL"
LINGUAS="pl"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="sparc X aim arts audiofile avi bash-completion berkdb bitmap-fonts bzip2 crypt cups curl dlloader eds encode esd exif expat fbcon font-server foomaticdb fortran gcc64 gdbm gif glut gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml icq idn imlib innodb jabber java javamail jpeg junit justify kde lcms ldap libwww mad mhash mikmod mime mng motif mozilla mozsvg mozxmlterm mpeg msn mysql ncurses nls nptl ogg oggvorbis opengl oss pam pcre pdflib perl php png postgres python qt readline samba sdl slang soap spell ssl svg tcpd tetex tidy tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode userlocales vorbis wmf xml2 xmlrpc xmms xpm xsl xv yahoo zlib linguas_pl userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET, LDFLAGS


The following did the trick in my case:

# emerge -avu1 --nodeps portage


HTH
Comment 76 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-01-12 22:30:12 UTC
*** Bug 118843 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 77 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-13 20:29:32 UTC
*** Bug 118944 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 78 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-14 00:43:06 UTC
*** Bug 118949 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 79 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-14 11:32:04 UTC
*** Bug 119011 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 80 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-01-14 18:20:52 UTC
*** Bug 119044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 81 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-16 00:12:15 UTC
*** Bug 119157 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 82 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-16 09:15:22 UTC
*** Bug 119207 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 83 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-16 13:02:21 UTC
*** Bug 119225 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 84 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-20 05:12:34 UTC
*** Bug 119681 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 85 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-21 09:05:05 UTC
*** Bug 119834 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 86 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-22 07:16:11 UTC
*** Bug 119922 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 87 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-23 08:46:26 UTC
*** Bug 120060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 88 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-24 07:24:41 UTC
*** Bug 120124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 89 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-25 00:00:11 UTC
*** Bug 120251 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 90 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-26 08:42:35 UTC
*** Bug 120424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 91 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-01-27 18:02:49 UTC
*** Bug 120594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 92 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-28 11:50:39 UTC
*** Bug 120755 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 93 Andrew Gaffney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-28 20:20:22 UTC
*** Bug 120786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 94 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-29 02:58:11 UTC
*** Bug 120804 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 95 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-29 16:46:14 UTC
*** Bug 120886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 96 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-30 00:33:32 UTC
*** Bug 120909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 97 Andrew Gaffney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-30 07:39:54 UTC
*** Bug 120944 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 98 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-31 10:23:08 UTC
*** Bug 121070 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 99 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-31 10:33:37 UTC
*** Bug 121072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 100 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-31 13:51:50 UTC
*** Bug 121096 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 101 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-01 14:07:01 UTC
*** Bug 121227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 102 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-02 07:29:15 UTC
*** Bug 121304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 103 Jerry 2006-02-02 08:26:15 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
I ran "emerge --av portage" and recieved "!!!ERROR: --av is an invalid option"
what next??
> I had the same problem.
> For newbies,
> After the
> ...
> wrote 681 bytes  read 3358865 bytes  21062.98 bytes/sec
> total size is 107648311  speedup is 32.04
> >>> Updating Portage cache:   88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an
> ebuild.
> !!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8)
> Do the following
> #emerge --av portage
> #emerge --sync
> This fixes the issue for me as per Jason Stubbs comment.
> Thanks

Comment 104 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-02 10:32:49 UTC
*** Bug 121323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 105 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-03 13:48:02 UTC
*** Bug 121472 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 106 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-02-04 22:42:12 UTC
*** Bug 121627 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 107 Andrew Gaffney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-05 09:10:33 UTC
*** Bug 121677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 108 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-05 10:48:42 UTC
*** Bug 121691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 109 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-05 15:42:07 UTC
*** Bug 121748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 110 aditsu 2006-02-05 16:28:08 UTC
emerge -av portage fixed it, thanks
Comment 111 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-02-06 16:52:02 UTC
*** Bug 121903 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 112 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-08 06:00:46 UTC
*** Bug 122112 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 113 Stephen Bennett (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-08 08:01:29 UTC
*** Bug 122132 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 114 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-09 07:48:14 UTC
*** Bug 122255 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 115 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-09 14:21:39 UTC
*** Bug 122313 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 116 solar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-09 19:07:37 UTC
*** Bug 122330 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 117 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-10 06:00:00 UTC
*** Bug 122364 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 118 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-11 00:44:53 UTC
*** Bug 122422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 119 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-11 09:22:55 UTC
*** Bug 122472 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 120 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-11 23:57:09 UTC
*** Bug 122504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 121 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-12 04:41:37 UTC
*** Bug 122544 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 122 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-13 08:26:45 UTC
*** Bug 122695 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 123 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-13 12:03:17 UTC
*** Bug 122719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 124 Stephen Bennett (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-15 06:40:28 UTC
*** Bug 122918 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 125 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-15 09:04:40 UTC
*** Bug 122937 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 126 solar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-15 15:41:43 UTC
*** Bug 122975 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 127 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-16 04:19:45 UTC
*** Bug 123020 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 128 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-02-16 18:42:11 UTC
*** Bug 123122 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 129 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-18 02:48:33 UTC
*** Bug 123243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 130 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-18 10:49:23 UTC
*** Bug 123300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 131 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-02-19 21:33:29 UTC
*** Bug 123441 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 132 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-20 03:17:17 UTC
*** Bug 123473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 133 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-20 15:13:54 UTC
*** Bug 123548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 134 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-21 07:07:16 UTC
*** Bug 123612 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 135 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-22 04:12:22 UTC
*** Bug 123701 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 136 Brian Harring (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-22 11:46:51 UTC
*** Bug 123730 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 137 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-23 00:35:12 UTC
*** Bug 123788 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 138 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-24 04:13:11 UTC
*** Bug 123914 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 139 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-25 12:20:24 UTC
*** Bug 124097 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 140 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-27 13:52:44 UTC
*** Bug 124294 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 141 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-02-28 01:13:09 UTC
*** Bug 124369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 142 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-01 22:57:33 UTC
*** Bug 124586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 143 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-02 15:44:01 UTC
*** Bug 124713 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 144 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-03 06:53:19 UTC
*** Bug 124798 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 145 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-04 13:06:48 UTC
*** Bug 125008 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 146 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-05 02:34:12 UTC
*** Bug 125058 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 147 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-05 08:11:38 UTC
*** Bug 125092 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 148 Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-08 17:41:10 UTC
*** Bug 125541 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 149 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-10 10:29:01 UTC
*** Bug 125739 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 150 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-15 07:31:19 UTC
*** Bug 126308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 151 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-17 12:02:46 UTC
*** Bug 126576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 152 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-18 17:22:12 UTC
*** Bug 126746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 153 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-03-19 18:43:18 UTC
*** Bug 126887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 154 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-20 06:06:17 UTC
*** Bug 126952 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 155 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-21 02:23:41 UTC
*** Bug 127055 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 156 dan 2006-03-22 13:40:23 UTC
*** Bug 127212 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 157 Kito (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-22 19:50:19 UTC
*** Bug 127250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 158 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-25 11:35:14 UTC
*** Bug 127551 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 159 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-28 07:54:56 UTC
*** Bug 127857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 160 solar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-29 04:08:33 UTC
*** Bug 127967 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 161 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-29 09:14:38 UTC
*** Bug 127999 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 162 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-30 07:47:59 UTC
*** Bug 128110 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 163 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-03-31 10:58:32 UTC
*** Bug 128279 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 164 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-02 06:57:52 UTC
*** Bug 128516 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 165 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-04 00:14:49 UTC
*** Bug 128724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 166 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-04 04:47:00 UTC
*** Bug 128757 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 167 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-05 05:34:26 UTC
*** Bug 128898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 168 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-06 11:20:57 UTC
*** Bug 129049 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 169 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-07 00:02:38 UTC
*** Bug 129078 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 170 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-09 02:27:48 UTC
*** Bug 129291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 171 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-09 23:51:40 UTC
*** Bug 129403 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 172 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-10 08:18:42 UTC
*** Bug 129484 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 173 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-04-13 22:25:53 UTC
*** Bug 129899 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 174 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-19 12:38:17 UTC
*** Bug 130511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 175 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-23 23:44:50 UTC
*** Bug 131043 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 176 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-25 10:19:09 UTC
*** Bug 131241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 177 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-25 11:37:59 UTC
*** Bug 131251 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 178 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-01 07:04:02 UTC
*** Bug 131904 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 179 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-08 14:22:14 UTC
*** Bug 132724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 180 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-10 12:27:47 UTC
*** Bug 132933 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 181 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-11 03:12:46 UTC
*** Bug 132991 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 182 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-05-11 18:58:05 UTC
*** Bug 133073 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 183 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-14 09:40:59 UTC
*** Bug 120455 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 184 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-14 09:41:09 UTC
*** Bug 120457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 185 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-14 11:49:15 UTC
*** Bug 133315 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 186 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-15 08:57:18 UTC
*** Bug 133388 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 187 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2006-05-17 02:45:15 UTC
*** Bug 133577 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 188 Marius Mauch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-22 13:43:20 UTC
*** Bug 134056 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 189 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-25 00:29:40 UTC
*** Bug 134278 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 190 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-25 00:32:48 UTC
*** Bug 134286 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 191 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-25 05:33:49 UTC
*** Bug 119749 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 192 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-25 05:34:04 UTC
*** Bug 134316 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 193 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-27 12:29:42 UTC
*** Bug 134548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 194 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-29 02:54:04 UTC
*** Bug 134708 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 195 Conrad Kostecki gentoo-dev 2006-06-07 08:06:52 UTC
Mediawiki-1.6.7 is wrong!

>>> Emerging (1 of 1) www-apps/mediawiki-1.6.7 to /
>>> checking ebuild checksums ;-)
>>> checking auxfile checksums ;-)
>>> checking miscfile checksums ;-)
>>> checking mediawiki-1.6.7.tar.gz
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/distfiles/mediawiki-1.6.7.tar.gz
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got: 2728980
!!! Expected: 12208
Comment 196 Alec Warner (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2006-06-07 08:13:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #195)
> Mediawiki-1.6.7 is wrong!
> 
> >>> Emerging (1 of 1) www-apps/mediawiki-1.6.7 to /
> >>> checking ebuild checksums ;-)
> >>> checking auxfile checksums ;-)
> >>> checking miscfile checksums ;-)
> >>> checking mediawiki-1.6.7.tar.gz
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/mediawiki-1.6.7.tar.gz
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> !!! Got: 2728980
> !!! Expected: 12208
> 

That has nothing to do with this bug, please file a bug seperately
Comment 197 Conrad Kostecki gentoo-dev 2006-06-07 10:37:22 UTC
Oh Shit ^^
Sry :(
Comment 198 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-03 23:49:46 UTC
*** Bug 139111 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 199 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-08 09:37:39 UTC
*** Bug 139680 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 200 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-14 13:33:24 UTC
*** Bug 140408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 201 Stephen George 2006-07-23 12:34:25 UTC
Created attachment 92572 [details]
results of emerge --info
Comment 202 Stephen George 2006-07-23 12:35:03 UTC
Created attachment 92573 [details]
results of uname -a (my sysinfo)
Comment 203 Stephen George 2006-07-23 12:35:34 UTC
Created attachment 92574 [details]
the error outputted after running emerge --sync
Comment 204 Stephen George 2006-07-23 12:35:58 UTC
Created attachment 92575 [details]
results of sysctl -a (my sys info)
Comment 205 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-23 12:47:46 UTC
This bug has been fixed. that means we no longer need any output of if either emerge --info, uname -a, emerge --sync or sysctl -a. It's already done, there's nothing more to do.
Comment 206 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-25 00:01:47 UTC
*** Bug 141646 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 207 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-22 00:03:23 UTC
*** Bug 144708 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 208 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-30 07:01:09 UTC
*** Bug 145600 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 209 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-31 12:14:40 UTC
*** Bug 145752 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 210 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-01 09:24:54 UTC
*** Bug 145865 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 211 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-12 03:43:23 UTC
*** Bug 147288 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 212 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-13 08:42:43 UTC
*** Bug 147460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 213 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-28 15:03:20 UTC
*** Bug 149456 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 214 genbug 2006-11-14 22:34:48 UTC
Backwards compatability is a wonderful thing, isnt it?

Looking at the level of confusion caused and the ammount of dev time wasted by this one, it would be useful to draw some lessons about the benefits of maintaining compatability.

Sometimes changes really are unavoidable but it this sort of breakage should be kept to the absolute minimum.

;)
Comment 215 Andrew Gaffney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-19 21:16:15 UTC
*** Bug 155737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 216 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-12-01 05:46:33 UTC
*** Bug 156794 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 217 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-12 22:31:27 UTC
*** Bug 166579 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 218 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-09 19:43:13 UTC
*** Bug 170151 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 219 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2007-04-08 02:04:07 UTC
*** Bug 173719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 220 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-04 22:00:36 UTC
*** Bug 177090 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 221 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-15 18:37:10 UTC
*** Bug 178666 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 222 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-07-10 18:10:24 UTC
*** Bug 184841 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 223 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-07-17 16:43:20 UTC
*** Bug 185671 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 224 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-07-25 14:21:46 UTC
*** Bug 186593 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 225 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-08-15 14:43:55 UTC
*** Bug 189006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 226 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2007-09-19 22:22:08 UTC
*** Bug 193125 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 227 Kurt Underhay 2007-09-19 22:35:55 UTC
I succeeded in updating portage with:
emerge -avu1 --nodeps portage

But now whenever I run emerge, I get the following error:
emerge -s portage
  File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 704
    for cpv in portdb.match(cp))
      ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax

Any advice? Or should this go to a forum or another bug?
Comment 228 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2007-09-19 22:57:10 UTC
(In reply to comment #227)
> I succeeded in updating portage with:
> emerge -avu1 --nodeps portage

--nodeps is dangerous.  Maybe you need to update python. Follow these instructions and try again without --nodeps:

http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/manually-fixing-portage.xml
Comment 229 Kurt Underhay 2007-09-19 23:17:05 UTC
Thanks. The reason I went the nodeps route was because the other suggestions in the comments for updating portage didn't work.

Having followed the instructions on the link provided I still get the same syntax error when running any emerge command:
emerge --help
  File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 704
    for cpv in portdb.match(cp))
      ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Comment 230 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2007-09-20 00:02:51 UTC
(In reply to comment #229)
>   File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 704
>     for cpv in portdb.match(cp))
>       ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax

The portage version that you unpacked is not compatible with your version of python. Try portage-2.1.1.tar.bz2 or even portage-2.0.51.22.tar.bz2 if necessary. If you still can't get it working then you should use an irc client to join #gentoo-portage on irc.freenode.net.
Comment 231 Stuart Luppescu 2007-10-05 15:49:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #230)
> (In reply to comment #229)
> >   File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 704
> >     for cpv in portdb.match(cp))
> >       ^
> > SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> 
> The portage version that you unpacked is not compatible with your version of
> python. Try portage-2.1.1.tar.bz2 or even portage-2.0.51.22.tar.bz2 if
> necessary. If you still can't get it working then you should use an irc client
> to join #gentoo-portage on irc.freenode.net.
> 

I'm in a big pickle here. I'm getting this error when I try to emerge portage or python. 

 Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an ebuild.
!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/libiconv-0)

I have portage-2.0.51.19 and python-2.3.4-r2 installed now. Should I just go ahead and emerge them both with nodeps?
Comment 232 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2007-10-05 16:06:01 UTC
Don't use --nodeps. Follow these instructions and pay careful attention the the part about python version compatibility:

http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/manually-fixing-portage.xml
Comment 233 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-21 17:23:41 UTC
*** Bug 199906 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 234 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-01 18:19:15 UTC
*** Bug 203973 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 235 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-03-10 09:27:33 UTC
*** Bug 212897 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 236 Bo Ørsted Andresen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-04-16 15:32:52 UTC
*** Bug 217969 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 237 Mark Knecht 2008-04-25 19:56:53 UTC
I've run into this bug today. For background only I have a 3 PC MythTV system at my parent's house. I built it back in 2005 I think and haven't touched it since. Finally we wanted to do some updates to it and I ran into this same bug.

I agree with a comment earlier in this thread that it would be better if there was *some* level of backward compatibility instead of things just dying. None the less here we are:

deleting app-accessibility/brltty/brltty-3.6.1.ebuild
deleting app-accessibility/brltty/brltty-3.5.ebuild
deleting app-accessibility/at-poke/files/digest-at-poke-0.2.2
deleting app-accessibility/SphinxTrain/files/digest-SphinxTrain-0.9.1-r1

Number of files: 124331
Number of files transferred: 95646
Total file size: 155953991 bytes
Total transferred file size: 146299148 bytes
Literal data: 146299148 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
File list size: 3029296
Total bytes written: 1913101
Total bytes read: 153638454

wrote 1913101 bytes  read 153638454 bytes  237302.14 bytes/sec
total size is 155953991  speedup is 1.00

>>> Updating Portage cache:   90%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an ebuild.
!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/ada-1995)
myth11 ~ #


Unfortunately the problem on this machine goes further as portage has completely removed every profile that was on the system and replaced them with new profiles. There is no overlap!

OLD PROFILES BEFORE emerge --sync:

myth11 ~ # ls -la /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/
total 60
drwxr-xr-x  10 root root 4096 Jun  3  2005 .
drwxr-xr-x  15 root root 4096 Jun  2  2005 ..
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root 4096 Apr 22  2005 2004.0
drwxr-xr-x   3 root root 4096 Apr 22  2005 2004.2
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root 4096 Jun 22  2005 2004.3
drwxr-xr-x   3 root root 4096 Mar 28  2005 2005.0
drwxr-xr-x   3 root root 4096 Jun  3  2005 2005.1
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root 4096 May  9  2005 gcc2
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root 4096 May  9  2005 gcc31
-rw-r--r--   1 root root  774 May 26  2005 make.defaults
-rw-r--r--   1 root root  563 Apr 28  2005 packages
-rw-r--r--   1 root root  336 May  9  2005 parent
-rw-r--r--   1 root root  539 May 20  2005 use.mask
-rw-r--r--   1 root root  449 Oct 25  2004 virtuals
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root 4096 May  9  2005 xbox
myth11 ~ #


NEW PROFILES AFTER emerge --sync:

 myth11 ~ # ls -la /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/
total 88
drwxr-xr-x   9 root root  4096 Apr 25 11:37 .
drwxr-xr-x  14 root root  4096 Apr 25 11:37 ..
drwxr-xr-x   4 root root  4096 Aug  8  2007 2006.1
drwxr-xr-x   4 root root  4096 Aug  8  2007 2007.0
-rw-r--r--   1 root root 23874 Apr 21 04:37 ChangeLog
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 Apr 25 11:37 dev
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 Aug  8  2007 gcc2
-rw-r--r--   1 root root  1145 May 15  2007 make.defaults
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 Apr 25 11:37 no-nptl
-rw-r--r--   1 root root  2940 Apr 21 04:37 package.mask
-rw-r--r--   1 root root   411 Jan 13 15:36 package.use.mask
-rw-r--r--   1 root root   563 Apr 28  2005 packages
-rw-r--r--   1 root root     3 Dec  2  2005 parent
-rw-r--r--   1 root root  1820 Apr  9 23:37 use.mask
-rw-r--r--   1 root root   402 Feb 23  2006 virtuals
drwxr-xr-x   3 root root  4096 Mar 30 09:07 vserver
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root  4096 Aug  8  2007 xbox
myth11 ~ #

I suspect that the correct upgrade path is to do the profile change, update the system step by step and slowly get it fixed. 

I really dislike that portage removes things from my system without warning me. emerge --sync breaks my very old but correctly working system.

Off to profile update land.
Comment 238 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-18 14:21:28 UTC
*** Bug 222579 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 239 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2008-06-02 20:04:36 UTC
*** Bug 224631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 240 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-29 15:33:03 UTC
*** Bug 230029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***