262490 – (gnome2.eclass) [TRACKER] gnome2.eclass missing features

Bug 262490 (gnome2.eclass) - [TRACKER] gnome2.eclass missing features

Summary: [TRACKER] gnome2.eclass missing features

Status:	CONFIRMED

Alias:	gnome2.eclass

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Eclasses (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	Tracker

Depends on:	580444 613364 615144 640020 239524 256379 262241 270919 301311 304701 312363 383899 383901 413299 448822 467996 472092 472928 481124 482082 482088 482646 483128 484876 486362 492544 508124 511928 511944 511946 515196 518422 523614 530046 530490 534312 535966 537654 538124 539118 549180 550736 571378 573390 591584 596674 658638
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2009-03-15 00:37 UTC by Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED)
Modified:	2018-06-21 09:32 UTC (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-03-15 00:37:42 UTC

This is a tracker bug for what sucks in our current version of the gnome2 eclass.

Comment 1 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-03-15 00:52:11 UTC

 * handling of docs.
 * things that should die or not ? (dodoc, annoying to find out by a report that you missed something you should have seen by building the package while doing the usual tests)
 * revisit the old tricks (the scrollkeeper/sandbox bug)
 * revisit the old tricks take two, GCONF_DEBUG ???
 * should we attempt to make the eclass reread defaults from installed schemas like gnome-panel ebuild does ?

discuss.

Comment 2 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-03-15 18:54:22 UTC

We should probably document it with the "new" eclass-man format too. But we can take care of that at the end.