Hi, I was trying to understand licencing information about oracle jdk and here's what I've figured out so far: (oracle-j refers to oracle-j:1.8 will end its official support for commercial users at April 2019. This means commercial users will not receive further free updates moving forward from that date. You can still use, commercially, an version 1.8.0.202 if you are willing to accept the security risks that involves. oracle-j:1.8 will continue its official support for public (personal) users until December 2020. This means you will continue to receive free updates until December 2020 for home usage. oracle-j:11 is available with a trap "You may not: use the Programs for any data processing or any commercial, production, or internal business purposes other than developing, testing, prototyping, and demonstrating your Application;" also we have as alternative/ icedtea{-bin} - which is what most desktop users want and it's fully supported by gentoo java team. openjdk:8 - which is mostly drop-in replacement for oracle-j:1.8 except for javafx. openjdk:11 - which is LTS release, and what most of the community moved to. The question is, should we and if yes for how long keep oracle-j:1.8 in the tree? Seems it's still ok to use at home until 2020. But anyone using gentoo in production can't legally use it anymore. Oracle plans to release next patch on Apr 16, which will be first non-publicly available patch which fixes some critical vulnerability. Thoughts, opinions?
It's not clear to me if the patch that's going to be released on Apr 16 will be available for "home" users or now. If not, I'd say let's just purge oracle-jdk, no reason to keep maintained, vulnerable version in the tree.
It is actually available for home users, but they need an Oracle account. Actually I started creating a bump. Should I continue with it or do you prefer to purge the ebuilds? The last time I really “needed” oracle-jdk-bin was a few weeks after JDK SE 9 release, when it was deemed a requirement for the exercises in compiler construction. So I can understand your intention to purge it from the tree. Due to the file size and the fetch restriction bumping it is extremely annoying. Purging it would be fine for me as long as this gives the java team time to closely track openjdk upstream.
here's the announcement from https://www.java.com/en/download/ Important Oracle Java License Update The Oracle Java License has changed for releases starting April 16, 2019. The new Oracle Technology Network License Agreement for Oracle Java SE is substantially different from prior Oracle Java licenses. The new license permits certain uses, such as personal use and development use, at no cost -- but other uses authorized under prior Oracle Java licenses may no longer be available. Please review the terms carefully before downloading and using this product. An FAQ is available here. Commercial license and support is available with a low cost Java SE Subscription. I think it should go and live in overlay if someone wants to maintain it, I'm not going to touch it except with rm -rf, I'll give it a week and will send last-rites and see how people react and if someone wants to maintain it.
Well, I’ve read the FAQ and the license. Their meaning of “personal use” differs substantially from Virtualbox (at least Virtualbox back in the Sun days). An overlay bump would require an ewarn with the following FAQ entry to make users aware of the license change. The license itself does not restrict license text distribution, so it would not violate GCO. --- Can you elaborate on what qualifies as Personal use? Personal use is using Java on a desktop or laptop computer to do things such as to play games or run other personal applications. If you are using Java on a desktop or laptop computer as part of any business operations, that is not personal use. For example, you could use a Java productivity application to do your own homework or your personal taxes, but you could not use it to do your business accounting. --- But I doubt, that it would have a lot of users. After all you need to create an Oracle account to fetch it and their javascript requires the company and function (in the company) fields to be filled. That account can’t be deleted after creation, which is great, because technically the OTN license does not grant any support, so they might not even answer a deletion request. +1 for rm -rf. ;)
I've just added new jdk ebuilds (openjdk-jre-bin 8 and 11) which going to replace oracle jre in case someone needs jre and not jdk.
Shouldn't we wait with the mask/removal until the new alternatives are stabilized?
technically yes, legally - I think no. icedtea-bin is stable. it covers most usecases (except javafx)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1c8b56a4314316b8a8234bca6bc26fc83b15d99b commit 1c8b56a4314316b8a8234bca6bc26fc83b15d99b Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2019-04-17 23:17:14 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2019-04-17 23:20:26 +0000 profiles: adjust oracle-java mask the mask broken the tree mask all future versions with new license for now. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
(In reply to Larry the Git Cow from comment #8) > The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/ > ?id=1c8b56a4314316b8a8234bca6bc26fc83b15d99b > > commit 1c8b56a4314316b8a8234bca6bc26fc83b15d99b > Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> > AuthorDate: 2019-04-17 23:17:14 +0000 > Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> > CommitDate: 2019-04-17 23:20:26 +0000 > > profiles: adjust oracle-java mask > > the mask broken the tree > mask all future versions with new license for now. > > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 > Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> > > profiles/package.mask | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) I like this. Please leave it there until we have some good alternative to it stabilized and then hard mask and remove later on.
Which option would you recommend as a "more close" replacement for oracle java? icedtea:0 or dev-java/openjdk-bin:8? Last time I tried to switch to icedtea from oracle java, I was still having some issues with some apps (like Serviio I think). I would like to retry but I am unsure of trying icedtea again or directly openjdk Thanks
For a seamless upgrade it's necessary to remove the mask for the gentoo-vm USE flag (otherwise java won't be in path): mkdir -p /etc/portage/profile echo "dev-java/openjdk-bin -gentoo-vm" >> /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask emerge -avC dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin USE="gentoo-vm" -av emerge dev-java/openjdk-bin I've tested elasticsearch/logstash/graylog/jenkins on openjdk-bin-8 and it works fine. Thanks
(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #10) > Which option would you recommend as a "more close" replacement for oracle > java? > openjdk{-bin} is pretty close. it can build packages, itself and works fine unless you need javafx classes. jce useflag is gone, default crypto policy is unlimited. openjdk:8 still has gentoo-vm useflag masked, but I'll unmask it soon after I fix some low-hanging fruit related to ca-certificates. it's required to unmask gentoo-vm to get it appear in eselect-java and to work with ebuids/eclasses/portage. So like Thomas said, unmask the flag, but add :8 a slot openjdk:11 is ok as standalone, but our eclasses/ebuilds are not quite ready for it and will likely fail, I do not recommend using it as system-vm, but totally fine if you call it by path explicitly for some apps.
OK, thanks for the info :)
(In reply to Georgy Yakovlev from comment #12) > (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #10) > > Which option would you recommend as a "more close" replacement for oracle > > java? > > > > openjdk{-bin} is pretty close. it can build packages, itself and works fine > unless you need javafx classes. Hi! Any news on this? Which JDK should I use for Java 8 now?
(In reply to Mike Limansky from comment #14) > > Hi! Any news on this? Which JDK should I use for Java 8 now? nothing changed. use icedtea (preferred) or openjdk or respective -bin variants. avoid oracle-jdk.
Will this package ever be updated to version 221? I'm still using this software to manage my Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance at home, and this doesn't work with OpenJDK or Icedtea. It throws an exception java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.deploy.trace.Trace at net.sourceforge.jnlp.runtime.JNLPClassLoader.loadClass(JNLPClassLoader.java:1562) at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:264) at com.cisco.launcher.i.a(Unknown Source) at com.cisco.launcher.i.if(Unknown Source) at com.cisco.launcher.i.a(Unknown Source) at com.cisco.launcher.s.if(Unknown Source) at com.cisco.launcher.Launcher.main(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.launchApplication(Launcher.java:574) at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher$TgThread.run(Launcher.java:936)
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/443c63673dcf813dd59f6655bd4c2aee dropped to maintainer-needed if you really up to it, feel free to pick it up. requirement to pick up is to fix https://bugs.gentoo.org/692420 ASAP
Should this be marked unmaintained if gentoo-vm is still masked?
(In reply to Red from comment #18) > Should this be marked unmaintained if gentoo-vm is still masked? it's not dropped, just unmaintained by java team. also icedtea is fine and is the default choice of jvm, it does not have or need gentoo-vm useflag.
(In reply to Georgy Yakovlev from comment #19) > (In reply to Red from comment #18) > > Should this be marked unmaintained if gentoo-vm is still masked? > > it's not dropped, just unmaintained by java team. > > also icedtea is fine and is the default choice of jvm, it does not have or > need gentoo-vm useflag. I use OpenJDK with gentoo-vm unmasked. However, I have problems compiling LibreOffice with OpenJDK as system-vm, so I leave Oracle as system-vm and OpenJDK as user-vm. Are you saying if I use IcedTea instead of OpenJDK, I won't have to worry about bug 682156 and can get rid of the outdated Java 8 package?
(In reply to Red from comment #20) > (In reply to Georgy Yakovlev from comment #19) > > (In reply to Red from comment #18) > > > Should this be marked unmaintained if gentoo-vm is still masked? > > > > it's not dropped, just unmaintained by java team. > > > > also icedtea is fine and is the default choice of jvm, it does not have or > > need gentoo-vm useflag. > > I use OpenJDK with gentoo-vm unmasked. However, I have problems compiling > LibreOffice with OpenJDK as system-vm, so I leave Oracle as system-vm and > OpenJDK as user-vm. > > Are you saying if I use IcedTea instead of OpenJDK, I won't have to worry > about bug 682156 and can get rid of the outdated Java 8 package? failures expected with :11 if it's used as system vm. icedtea (which is openjdk:8 + patches) or openjdk:8 should be fine. it's not outdated, it's just LTS version and will be around longer that version 11.
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/14083
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=d4af3e28cd9e0c213b5d012995fc0c620054bd86 commit d4af3e28cd9e0c213b5d012995fc0c620054bd86 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2019-12-22 01:17:09 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2019-12-22 01:51:33 +0000 profiles/package.deprecated: add oracle java Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/14083 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> profiles/package.deprecated | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=8299bea7bf98ce7dc9552fd0af7384f8b821ee70 commit 8299bea7bf98ce7dc9552fd0af7384f8b821ee70 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-04-18 20:51:18 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-04-19 04:02:10 +0000 profiles/package.mask: mask oracle-{jdk,jre}-bin and revdeps Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/15401 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=297ffb46ae4e4ddb33702f37e841ef4c3cc042ba commit 297ffb46ae4e4ddb33702f37e841ef4c3cc042ba Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-04-19 09:57:14 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-04-19 09:59:25 +0000 profiles: unmask sleuthkit and mask java useflag Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> profiles/base/package.use.mask | 4 ++++ profiles/package.mask | 1 - 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
The app-text/jabref-bin removal is really a problem for me, since I you cannot move back to version 2 (the file format has not backwardcompatible changes). What are exactly the problems with JabRefs binary packages. Can they be fixed via the ebuild?
(In reply to Till Schäfer from comment #26) > The app-text/jabref-bin removal is really a problem for me, since I you > cannot move back to version 2 (the file format has not backwardcompatible > changes). What are exactly the problems with JabRefs binary packages. Can > they be fixed via the ebuild? See Bug 718152
for everyone who subscribed to this bug. I've packaged openjfx-8 and finishing ebuild. that's all those masked packages can be saved after I commit openjfx-8 and add support for it in icedtea and openjdk. It takes time to test, but it'll be committed soon. Before dropping oracle jdk we will have openjfx/javafx replacement. openjfx-8 will be compatible with source and -bin versions of icedtea and openjdk.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=0a7f740c6a58e860b062ec62619ea01aae863400 commit 0a7f740c6a58e860b062ec62619ea01aae863400 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 03:08:34 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 03:11:41 +0000 virtual/jre: revbump 11, remove oracle provider Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.4, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jre/jre-11-r2.ebuild | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=83a1e5413257ef13dec0e480a3096091d3682856 commit 83a1e5413257ef13dec0e480a3096091d3682856 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 03:07:30 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 03:11:36 +0000 virtual/jdk: revbump 11, remove oracle provider Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.4, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jdk/jdk-11-r1.ebuild | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c8426bca4cadb376ac4d52c57595b1aa7670b051 commit c8426bca4cadb376ac4d52c57595b1aa7670b051 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 03:06:01 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 03:11:31 +0000 virtual/jre: revbump 1.8.0 remove oracle as provider Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.4, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jre/jre-1.8.0-r3.ebuild | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=aebb1a4d39b51d9192880b5ee08b5451ea558304 commit aebb1a4d39b51d9192880b5ee08b5451ea558304 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 03:04:10 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 03:11:15 +0000 virtual/jdk: revbump 1.8.0, move openjdk to preferred and remove oracle as provider Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.4, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jdk/jdk-1.8.0-r5.ebuild | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=0ca55f5ae95a46b6b702af34614c24090d117f62 commit 0ca55f5ae95a46b6b702af34614c24090d117f62 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 02:13:10 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 02:56:28 +0000 dev-java/openjdk: add javafx flag to openjdk8 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.4, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> dev-java/openjdk/metadata.xml | 1 + dev-java/openjdk/openjdk-8.265_p01.ebuild | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4eda5ab2b3cb995c23c2af6b2b0397637c2b21f0 commit 4eda5ab2b3cb995c23c2af6b2b0397637c2b21f0 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 01:10:05 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 02:56:26 +0000 dev-java/openjfx: add openjfx8 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/547918 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.4, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> dev-java/openjfx/Manifest | 1 + .../8/0000-Fix-wait-call-in-PosixPlatform.patch | 14 ++ dev-java/openjfx/files/8/0001-Change-Lucene.patch | 79 +++++++++ .../openjfx/files/8/0001-don-t-force-msse.patch | 69 ++++++++ ...0002-Allow-build-to-work-on-newer-gradles.patch | 10 ++ ...-cast-between-incompatible-function-types.patch | 77 +++++++++ .../files/8/0004-Fix-Compilation-Flags.patch | 23 +++ .../files/8/0005-don-t-include-xlocale.h.patch | 25 +++ .../8/06-disable-architecture-verification.patch | 21 +++ ...07-disable-assembler-on-unsupported-archs.patch | 18 ++ dev-java/openjfx/files/8/10-javadoc-locale.patch | 21 +++ dev-java/openjfx/files/8/99-sysdeps.patch | 30 ++++ dev-java/openjfx/files/8/Wno-error.patch | 121 ++++++++++++++ .../openjfx/files/8/disable-online-repos.patch | 54 ++++++ dev-java/openjfx/files/8/respect_flags.patch | 22 +++ dev-java/openjfx/openjfx-8.202.ebuild | 185 +++++++++++++++++++++ 16 files changed, 770 insertions(+)
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=6368ce70e7084394864b40ddd8a04039fc94e94f commit 6368ce70e7084394864b40ddd8a04039fc94e94f Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 05:28:55 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 05:28:55 +0000 profiles/package.mask: unmask jabref-bin Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Update on current situation: 1) openjfx:8 added to the tree. Since it's obsolete version, it will never be stable and comes without bundled webkit, so apps that require JavaFX web stuff will probably not work. It's a security decision. 2) javafx flag for openjdk:8 is stable.masked, so stable system users will need to unmask it to use. ~arch users can use right away. 3) all [javafx] dependent consumers will have to be ~unstable. 4) javafx useflag for openjfx-bin, icedtea, icedtea-bin and maybe openjdk-jre-bin will be added soon-ish, need to sort-out dependencies properly. 5) oracle jdks to be removed real soon. 6) icedtea (and icedtea-bin) becomes secondary choice of jdk/jvm in gentoo, virtuals updated, but unstable for now. it was java team decision because icedtea upstream started lagging with releases. current version is 2 month behind has more than 10 CVEs. if released, icedtea-3.17 and future versions are not getting stable keywords, until it gets back on track. if icedtea continues to lag - it will be removed. 7) openjdk is new default, bumps usually happen same day as upstream releases. new virtuals will be stabilized soon. It took more than a year to get to this stage, a lot of work was done, I hope everyone is ok with current state of openjdk ebuilds. lmk if you have questions or complaints.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=6a7faaad2f8c5312dfb8d6e539b5a7346652e98b commit 6a7faaad2f8c5312dfb8d6e539b5a7346652e98b Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-18 22:36:24 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:29 +0000 dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin: remove last rited pkg Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/732630 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/717638 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/575978 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/686672 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/684306 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/692420 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/684120 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/17594 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin/Manifest | 15 -- .../oracle-jdk-bin/files/fontconfig.properties | 161 ----------- .../oracle-jdk-bin/files/oracle-jdk-bin-9.env.sh | 16 -- .../oracle-jdk-bin/files/oracle-jdk-bin.env.sh | 16 -- dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin/metadata.xml | 16 -- .../oracle-jdk-bin/oracle-jdk-bin-1.8.0.202.ebuild | 297 --------------------- .../oracle-jdk-bin/oracle-jdk-bin-11.0.2.ebuild | 247 ----------------- 7 files changed, 768 deletions(-) Additionally, it has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=9b90dc11589343236a9b3d80a1dacba116271e23 commit 9b90dc11589343236a9b3d80a1dacba116271e23 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 07:52:24 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:34 +0000 virtual/jre: add ~arm keyword to 11 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.7, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jre/jre-11-r2.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=6fdc35648cef346db47718728ea5b0dd4bb3f959 commit 6fdc35648cef346db47718728ea5b0dd4bb3f959 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 07:50:46 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:33 +0000 virtual/jdk: add ~arm keyword to 11 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.7, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jdk/jdk-11-r1.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=5b642ddcd5fd7dccff144a873ada94f405701ab6 commit 5b642ddcd5fd7dccff144a873ada94f405701ab6 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 07:48:27 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:32 +0000 virtual/jdk: drop old Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.7, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jdk/jdk-1.8.0-r3.ebuild | 14 -------------- virtual/jdk/jdk-1.8.0-r4.ebuild | 16 ---------------- virtual/jdk/jdk-11.ebuild | 14 -------------- 3 files changed, 44 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b6c379404a1146596eca6e535e27c2f9ffdd9c87 commit b6c379404a1146596eca6e535e27c2f9ffdd9c87 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 07:47:48 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:32 +0000 virtual/jdk: 1.8.0-r5 stable Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.7, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jdk/jdk-1.8.0-r5.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=5084dde5ec76ff58738d7ba92a9ec052019ddb23 commit 5084dde5ec76ff58738d7ba92a9ec052019ddb23 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 07:46:12 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:31 +0000 virtual/jre: drop old Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.7, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jre/jre-1.8.0-r1.ebuild | 13 ------------- virtual/jre/jre-1.8.0-r2.ebuild | 14 -------------- 2 files changed, 27 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=32c30339e266268b73fa39c0ff0ec121fcc5006b commit 32c30339e266268b73fa39c0ff0ec121fcc5006b Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 07:45:37 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:30 +0000 virtual/jre: 1.8-r3 stable Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.7, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jre/jre-1.8.0-r3.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=01284825796f21c0581f237b9619e20d5543db7b commit 01284825796f21c0581f237b9619e20d5543db7b Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-19 07:43:59 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:30 +0000 virtual/jre: drop old 11 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.7, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> virtual/jre/jre-11-r1.ebuild | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=03c170e1755aeb6ccbf225489efc5f2282ab2ac1 commit 03c170e1755aeb6ccbf225489efc5f2282ab2ac1 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-18 22:36:04 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:29 +0000 dev-java/oracle-jre-bin: remove last rited pkg Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> dev-java/oracle-jre-bin/Manifest | 2 - .../oracle-jre-bin/files/fontconfig.properties | 161 --------------- .../oracle-jre-bin/files/oracle-jre-bin.env.sh | 16 -- dev-java/oracle-jre-bin/metadata.xml | 11 -- .../oracle-jre-bin/oracle-jre-bin-1.8.0.202.ebuild | 220 --------------------- 5 files changed, 410 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f29f706c3b7ec2a7144133100719297bcd7b0836 commit f29f706c3b7ec2a7144133100719297bcd7b0836 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-18 22:35:23 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:28 +0000 dev-java/netbeans-harness: remove last rited pkg Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> dev-java/netbeans-harness/Manifest | 7 -- dev-java/netbeans-harness/metadata.xml | 12 --- .../netbeans-harness/netbeans-harness-8.2.ebuild | 100 --------------------- 3 files changed, 119 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=142ee89e7e82fcedd1faf405d0737c175bf741c1 commit 142ee89e7e82fcedd1faf405d0737c175bf741c1 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-18 22:34:59 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:27 +0000 dev-java/netbeans-platform: remove last rited pkg Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> dev-java/netbeans-platform/Manifest | 17 --- dev-java/netbeans-platform/metadata.xml | 12 -- .../netbeans-platform/netbeans-platform-8.2.ebuild | 154 --------------------- 3 files changed, 183 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=eb216b6dbf46e7f9ae601b98107683727112021e commit eb216b6dbf46e7f9ae601b98107683727112021e Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-18 22:33:38 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:27 +0000 games-util/pogo-manager-bin: remove last-rited pkg Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> games-util/pogo-manager-bin/Manifest | 2 -- games-util/pogo-manager-bin/files/pogo-manager | 17 ----------- games-util/pogo-manager-bin/metadata.xml | 8 ----- .../pogo-manager-bin/pogo-manager-bin-0.1.6.ebuild | 34 ---------------------- .../pogo-manager-bin/pogo-manager-bin-0.1.7.ebuild | 34 ---------------------- 5 files changed, 95 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=8828564687a59a56f727374ebb26fee5866fb389 commit 8828564687a59a56f727374ebb26fee5866fb389 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-18 22:33:02 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:26 +0000 net-p2p/bisq: remove last rited pkg Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/666770 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> net-p2p/bisq/Manifest | 858 ----------------------------------- net-p2p/bisq/bisq-0.6.3.ebuild | 996 ----------------------------------------- net-p2p/bisq/metadata.xml | 11 - 3 files changed, 1865 deletions(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=90984c758eee77ebd0a16554517c768e8cfa3b72 commit 90984c758eee77ebd0a16554517c768e8cfa3b72 Author: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-09-18 22:32:22 +0000 Commit: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-19 08:05:25 +0000 sci-mathematics/geogebra: remove last rited pkg please use sci-mathematics/geogebra-bin instead Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/719076 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681828 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/644968 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/715474 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/618806 Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org> sci-mathematics/geogebra/Manifest | 223 -------------- .../geogebra-5.0.339.0_p20170308-r1.ebuild | 339 --------------------- sci-mathematics/geogebra/metadata.xml | 17 -- 3 files changed, 579 deletions(-)
(In reply to Georgy Yakovlev from comment #31) > Update on current situation: Thanks a lot for the work and all the information :)
