Bug 284780 – Stable =media-video/vlc-1.0.1

• Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 285370
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2009-09-13 16:07:16 UTC]

See depending bugs.

[Comment 1 Jory A. Pratt 2009-09-14 02:17:24 UTC]

This is not ready for stable yet, It does not make use of proper libxul when building nsplugin. This results in revdep-rebuild rebuilding vlc each and every time.

[Comment 2 Jory A. Pratt 2009-09-14 02:30:28 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> This is not ready for stable yet, It does not make use of proper libxul when
> building nsplugin. This results in revdep-rebuild rebuilding vlc each and every
> time.
> 

Strike my last, I found the issue, it is gonna be system specific. Sorry for the noise.

[Comment 3 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2009-09-14 20:16:32 UTC]

What about libxcb >= 1.4 and schroedinger?

[Comment 4 Alexis Ballier 2009-09-14 21:02:53 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> What about libxcb >= 1.4

its 1.1.90.1, but yeah better ask x11 team.

> and schroedinger?
 

should be fine.

[Comment 5 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2009-09-14 21:37:44 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > What about libxcb >= 1.4
> 
> its 1.1.90.1, but yeah better ask x11 team.

 Remi?

[Comment 6 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) 2009-09-14 22:14:12 UTC]

I take it you'd like to know when libxcb has a chance of going stable? :)

Soon, like along with xorg-server 1.6. So now that the livedvd is around, I'll try to take care of that after the dvd is released.

So you might be interested in bug #282290 to see where we're at. In short, we're nearly ready. We just need to fix 2 or 3 eselect-opengl bugs and start asking for testers through planet.g.o.

Hope that sheds some light on where we're at :)

Cheers

[Comment 7 Nirbheek Chauhan (RETIRED) 2009-09-15 13:37:07 UTC]

Why does it need libxcb-1.1.90.1 ? And can libxcb-1.1.90.1 go stable without the rest of X?

[Comment 8 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) 2009-09-15 14:47:38 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> Why does it need libxcb-1.1.90.1 ? And can libxcb-1.1.90.1 go stable without
> the rest of X?

NAK, it's either the current stable or 1.4. Versions in between cause locking bugs with Xlib.

[Comment 9 Alexis Ballier 2009-09-15 21:02:08 UTC]

after all it was simpler than that... there was a patch in master to support older xcb-xv versions, so now we dont need newer xcb than what stable has.

[Comment 10 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2009-09-16 13:42:40 UTC]

Ok, schroedinger wants Gstreamer 1.0.24 (which is not stable)....

Is that ok?

[Comment 11 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2009-09-16 13:46:28 UTC]

(In reply to comment #10)
> Ok, schroedinger wants Gstreamer 1.0.24 (which is not stable)....
> 
> Is that ok?
> 

Might be, but let me emphatize that it isn't required. You can go with 1.0.7 instead of 1.0.7 -r1 or -r2. The only difference is GStreamer compability patches.

[Comment 12 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2009-09-16 13:59:47 UTC]

(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Ok, schroedinger wants Gstreamer 1.0.24 (which is not stable)....
> > 
> > Is that ok?
> > 
> 
> Might be, but let me emphatize that it isn't required. You can go with 1.0.7
> instead of 1.0.7 -r1 or -r2. The only difference is GStreamer compability
> patches.

 Ok, I misread the DEPEND line, but nonetheless, it would be better to do both together to not have problems when Gstreaner 1.0.24 goes stable and nobody thinks of schroedinger.

[Comment 13 Alexis Ballier 2009-09-20 10:10:07 UTC]

we'll handle stabilization of 1.0.2 in bug #285370

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 285370 ***