Bug 296658 (gcc-4.5)

Summary:	[tracker] GCC 4.5 porting
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Ryan Hill (RETIRED) <rhill>
Component:	[OLD] GCC Porting	Assignee:	Please assign to toolchain <gcc-porting>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	404errorqc, akshayushah, alecm_88, ansla80, armin76, axiator, b.brachaczek, bugs+gentoo, che, conan, daggs, dberkholz, didier-bugzillagentoo, eugene.shalygin, flameeyes, hiyuh.root, hwoarang, jackdachef, jlp.bugs, jrmalaq, kredba, marduk, nelchael, nikoli, niogic, orzel, sattva, solar, spatz, StormByte, tdalman, xarthisius, xmw
Priority:	Lowest	Keywords:	Tracker
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:	301675, 301795, 304755, 304917, 305749, 308653, 310847, 312435, 314201, 314471, 314483, 315619, 317139, 317155, 317163, 317175, 317189, 317207, 317343, 317465, 317467, 317507, 317509, 317695, 317727, 317747, 317751, 317815, 317969, 317991, 317997, 318045, 318127, 318215, 318393, 318409, 318411, 318429, 318483, 318575, 318579, 318581, 318583, 318585, 318591, 318601, 318637, 318661, 319027, 319355, 319361, 319363, 319371, 319375, 319387, 319425, 319435, 319679, 319789, 320107, 320207, 320337, 320377, 320421, 320459, 320543, 320741, 320787, 320863, 320879, 321009, 321195, 321197, 321209, 321293, 321297, 321323, 321325, 321357, 321411, 321659, 322145, 322203, 322211, 322213, 322217, 322219, 322227, 322263, 322359, 322361, 322523, 322525, 322593, 322595, 322647, 322725, 323053, 323055, 323061, 323063, 323075, 323079, 323545, 323547, 324547, 324863, 326613, 329083, 330865, 334415, 335185, 336781, 339666, 339745, 339844, 341743, 346793, 347758, 347782, 348552
Bug Blocks:	315377, 357479
Attachments:	-

Description Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-12-12 21:06:43 UTC

This bug is used for the tracking of packages broken by the upcoming GCC 4.5 release, which has now entered the pre-release stage.

 - File a NEW bug for each issue and make it BLOCK this one.  Assign these bugs to the maintainer of the package in question, NOT gcc-porting@g.o please.
 - Bugs filed without patches will be closed as INVALID.
 - Don't use this bug for issues in GCC 4.5 itself.  File a new bug and assign it to the toolchain team.
 - Please keep this tracker free from comments.  Discussion should take place on the relevant bugs.

Comment 1 Mike Lothian 2010-04-23 19:31:29 UTC

Should bugs with new GCC features (such as -lto) be filed against this bug too?

Comment 2 Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-04-23 21:09:38 UTC

 - Don't use this bug for issues in GCC 4.5 itself.  File a new bug and assign
it to the toolchain team

make it block bug #315377 as well.

Comment 3 Martin Väth 2010-06-03 14:25:33 UTC

Created attachment 233977 [details, diff]
-

Comment 4 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-06-03 14:28:01 UTC

Comment on attachment 233977 [details, diff]
-

not here

Comment 5 Martin Väth 2010-06-03 14:30:38 UTC

Comment on attachment 233977 [details, diff]
-

I am very sorry for the misdirected attachment which was meant for another bug, of course.

Comment 6 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-06-03 17:26:37 UTC

Just a reminder @ALL:

Please remember to send gcc-4.5 patches upstream 


Thanks

Comment 7 Joel Berendzen 2010-11-09 17:11:18 UTC

I just rebuilt some amd64 systems which have ~3200 packages installed on them (including most of sci-biology and sci-chemistry and grub-1.98) without issues.  I'd say it's ready to be unmasked.

Comment 8 Raymond Jennings 2011-02-01 16:34:17 UTC

I second the motion.

I have an Atom CPU which could benefit from an atom specific -march as mentioned in the feature list.

Comment 9 Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-02-02 01:04:33 UTC

This has been unmasked for months now.

It's not going into stable for quite a while yet.

Comment 10 Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-03-05 04:00:50 UTC

Time to close this.