Bug 262490 (gnome2.eclass)

Summary:	[TRACKER] gnome2.eclass missing features
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) <eva>
Component:	Eclasses	Assignee:	Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome>
Status:	CONFIRMED ---
Severity:	enhancement	CC:	alexander, esigra, nikoli
Priority:	Normal	Keywords:	Tracker
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:	580444, 613364, 615144, 640020, 239524, 256379, 262241, 270919, 301311, 304701, 312363, 383899, 383901, 413299, 448822, 467996, 472092, 472928, 481124, 482082, 482088, 482646, 483128, 484876, 486362, 492544, 508124, 511928, 511944, 511946, 515196, 518422, 523614, 530046, 530490, 534312, 535966, 537654, 538124, 539118, 549180, 550736, 571378, 573390, 591584, 596674, 658638
Bug Blocks:

Description Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-03-15 00:37:42 UTC

This is a tracker bug for what sucks in our current version of the gnome2 eclass.

Comment 1 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-03-15 00:52:11 UTC

 * handling of docs.
 * things that should die or not ? (dodoc, annoying to find out by a report that you missed something you should have seen by building the package while doing the usual tests)
 * revisit the old tricks (the scrollkeeper/sandbox bug)
 * revisit the old tricks take two, GCONF_DEBUG ???
 * should we attempt to make the eclass reread defaults from installed schemas like gnome-panel ebuild does ?

discuss.

Comment 2 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-03-15 18:54:22 UTC

We should probably document it with the "new" eclass-man format too. But we can take care of that at the end.