This should be unbundled.
No idea what tweaks people did for repeatmasker. Hmm, I made yet another, sci-biology/ncbi-blast+ (in sci overlay). On a general note, ncbi-blast+ is released from NCBI at higher pace than ncbi-tools++ so while at the very moment there is only blast+-2.2.28 available through ncbi-tools++ bundle there is for a long while blast+-2.2.30 through ncbi-blast+ (smaller subset, faster release procedure). So, it makes sense to provide both, even I would say to allow the smaller subset to overwrite binaries from the huge bundle (yeah, forcing static build but that's not a problem). But the question what is different to the version from repeatmasker ... I don't know. First the ebuilds for ncbi-tools++ and ncbi-blast+ should get polished (by you) ;-) , moved to main tree, then I would say one could think of rmblast variant.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=d5c451e59a806404de4c3a9428a10c04a4f77dfc commit d5c451e59a806404de4c3a9428a10c04a4f77dfc Author: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-02-10 09:16:27 +0000 Commit: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-02-10 09:17:33 +0000 sci-biology/rmblast: treeclean Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/515962 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579248 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/664518 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/711246 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/716172 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/457972 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/724466 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/828706 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 1 - sci-biology/rmblast/Manifest | 2 -- sci-biology/rmblast/metadata.xml | 8 ------ sci-biology/rmblast/rmblast-1.2-r1.ebuild | 47 ------------------------------- 4 files changed, 58 deletions(-)
