Bug 566378 – Gnome 3.18 stable request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Pacho Ramos 2015-11-21 12:44:51 UTC]

For tracking purposes

[Comment 1 Pacho Ramos 2016-01-31 10:19:29 UTC]

*** Bug 569306 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 2 Pacho Ramos 2016-01-31 10:20:28 UTC]

*** Bug 569510 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 3 Pacho Ramos 2016-01-31 10:21:23 UTC]

*** Bug 569726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 4 Pacho Ramos 2016-01-31 11:50:37 UTC]

Created attachment 424300 [details]
list

[Comment 5 Pacho Ramos 2016-01-31 19:49:40 UTC]

Created attachment 424364 [details]
list

[Comment 6 Pacho Ramos 2016-02-01 20:26:41 UTC]

Created attachment 424422 [details]
list

[Comment 7 Pacho Ramos 2016-02-20 13:55:51 UTC]

Created attachment 425986 [details]
lista

[Comment 8 Pacho Ramos 2016-02-21 09:36:38 UTC]

Created attachment 426052 [details]
lista

[Comment 9 Pacho Ramos 2016-02-21 16:13:03 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 10 Pacho Ramos 2016-02-21 17:48:29 UTC]

Well, it looks to be imposible to push the changes as , while it is rebasing, something is committed and I need to repeat :S

Were this the advantages of git? :S

Enough for today

[Comment 11 Markus Meier 2016-02-21 18:54:23 UTC]

The following atoms do not exist from your list:
=app-text/iso-codes-3.65
=dev-cpp/mm-common-0.9.10
=dev-libs/appstream-glib-0.5.9
=gnome-base/gvfs-1.26.3
=gnome-extra/libgsf-1.14.36
=media-fonts/cantarell-0.0.22
=x11-libs/libwnck-3.14.1

[Comment 12 Pacho Ramos 2016-02-21 22:58:52 UTC]

is your tree updated? For example:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/app-text/iso-codes

:/

[Comment 13 Pacho Ramos 2016-02-21 23:46:19 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 14 Matt Turner 2016-02-22 08:11:09 UTC]

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #13)
> amd64 stable

You missed gnome-shell.

[Comment 15 Pacho Ramos 2016-02-22 09:06:34 UTC]

It is done now, I am unsure why some were missed while rebasing

[Comment 16 Pacho Ramos 2016-02-28 12:00:10 UTC]

Created attachment 426880 [details]
lista

Pull in a newer glib revision that fixes a memleak

[Comment 17 Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED) 2016-03-01 05:21:51 UTC]

Created attachment 427068 [details]
lista

bump to media-fonts/cantarell-0.0.24 because of bug #575398 (and required for harfbuzz security stabilization in bug #572856)

[Comment 18 Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED) 2016-03-01 05:24:23 UTC]

@amd64, please stabilize
=media-fonts/cantarell-0.0.24

(all other amd64 stabilizations in attached list were already finished by Pacho:)

[Comment 19 Pacho Ramos 2016-03-05 09:36:45 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 20 Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED) 2016-03-06 03:40:03 UTC]

Created attachment 427546 [details]
lista

bump to dev-libs/libgit2-glib-0.23.10-r1 because of bug #576550

[Comment 21 Pacho Ramos 2016-03-09 15:45:52 UTC]

@Mike, it looks like you did x86 (thanks!) but x86 team is still CCed... was done on purpose? I mean, was the stabilization completed on x86 or is was it interrupted at some point?

[Comment 22 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) 2016-03-12 18:51:30 UTC]

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #21)
> @Mike, it looks like you did x86 (thanks!) but x86 team is still CCed... was
> done on purpose? I mean, was the stabilization completed on x86 or is was it
> interrupted at some point?

It was corrupted due to my Internet connection for some days (some gst plugins are left). I will back to it ASAP

[Comment 23 Fab 2016-03-16 14:02:33 UTC]

Please also stabilize gnome-base/librsvg-2.40.13-r1.
Random crashs on stable desktops are irritating.
See bug #575496.

[Comment 24 Pacho Ramos 2016-04-02 20:40:44 UTC]

x86 done

[Comment 25 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2016-04-07 10:20:09 UTC]

Stable for HPPA PPC64. I think.

[Comment 26 Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED) 2016-05-02 02:10:18 UTC]

Created attachment 432892 [details]
lista

bump to dev-libs/glib-2.46.2-r3 because of bug #577686

[Comment 27 Markus Meier 2016-05-03 20:57:53 UTC]

arm stable

[Comment 28 Pacho Ramos 2016-05-29 21:10:41 UTC]

Pending arches, please jump to bug 584468