Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 28211 - Sandbox violation
Summary: Sandbox violation
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 29846
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: Sparc Linux
: Highest critical (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Perl team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 29675 29715 30218 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-09-08 13:50 UTC by Alexey Parshin
Modified: 2005-07-17 13:06 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
The result of 'emerge info' (emerge info,1.50 KB, text/plain)
2003-09-08 13:53 UTC, Alexey Parshin
Details
The result of 'emerge info' (emerge_info,1.50 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-09-08 13:54 UTC, Alexey Parshin
Details
The result of emerge info (emerge_info,1.50 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-09-08 13:54 UTC, Alexey Parshin
Details
The result of emerge info (emerge_info,1.50 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-09-08 13:54 UTC, Alexey Parshin
Details
The result of emerge info (emerge_info,1.50 KB, text/plain)
2003-09-08 13:55 UTC, Alexey Parshin
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexey Parshin 2003-09-08 13:50:29 UTC
During attempt to emerge gnome I get the following error:


alexhome root # emerge fam-oss
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) app-admin/fam-oss-2.6.10-r1 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) fam-2.6.10.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking fam-2.6.10.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/fam-oss-2.6.10-r1/work
 * Applying dnotify.patch.new...                                          [ ok ]
* Applying fam-2.6.7-cleanup.patch...                                    [ ok ]
* Applying fam-oss-2.6.10-largefile.patch...                             [ ok ]
* Applying fam-oss-2.6.10-nostatvfs.patch...                             [ ok ]
* Working directory: /var/tmp/portage/fam-oss-2.6.10-r1/work/fam-2.6.10...
 * Applying libtool-relink.patch...
 * Applying libtool-tmp.patch...
 * Applying libtool-sed.patch...
 * Applying libtool-portage.patch...
ACCESS DENIED  symlink:   /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/base.pm
configure.in: installing `./missing'
>>> Source unpacked.
--------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---------------------------LOG FILE = "/tmp/sandbox-fam-oss-2.6.10-r1-18638.log"

symlink:   /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/base.pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------alexhome
root # 


I've tried to reinstall the whole thing and received the same result. I also
received the same error message from attempts to emerge some kde packages, about
the same 'base.pm' file.

My settings include:

FEATURES="sandbox ccache userpriv"
Comment 1 Alexey Parshin 2003-09-08 13:53:03 UTC
Created attachment 17275 [details]
The result of 'emerge info'
Comment 2 Alexey Parshin 2003-09-08 13:54:04 UTC
Created attachment 17276 [details]
The result of 'emerge info'
Comment 3 Alexey Parshin 2003-09-08 13:54:17 UTC
Created attachment 17277 [details]
The result of emerge info
Comment 4 Alexey Parshin 2003-09-08 13:54:35 UTC
Created attachment 17279 [details]
The result of emerge info
Comment 5 Alexey Parshin 2003-09-08 13:55:04 UTC
Created attachment 17280 [details]
The result of emerge info
Comment 6 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-08 15:59:18 UTC
please don't set all sorts of stuff, we can very well assess importance of a bug ourselves, probably better than you.

And don't assign it directly to gnome just because it happens in a gnome emerge. We are not the fam maintainers really and this very much looks like a perl problem. Thank you.
Comment 7 Sven Blumenstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-15 23:09:56 UTC
I had the same error with Abiword. See Bug 27225.
I also read that some people at the forums reported the same issue with exactly the same error message. 

Come on Perl Team, wake up!
Comment 8 Jason Wever (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-26 19:00:07 UTC
We are starting to get a lot of bugs on this.  Can someone either look into
it or suggest a point of attack?
Comment 9 Jason Wever (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-26 19:01:32 UTC
*** Bug 29675 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Jason Wever (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-26 19:02:23 UTC
*** Bug 29715 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Jason Wever (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-02 17:48:06 UTC
*** Bug 30218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Brian Jackson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-04 14:11:57 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29846 ***