Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 789573 - sci-visualization/paraview-5.9.0 fails to compile with gcc-11
Summary: sci-visualization/paraview-5.9.0 fails to compile with gcc-11
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Matthias Maier
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: PATCH
: 794124 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: gcc-11
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2021-05-12 06:35 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2021-06-15 03:22 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
build.log.xz (build.log.xz,58.11 KB, application/x-xz)
2021-05-12 06:35 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo 		Details
gcc11.patch (gcc11.patch,661 bytes, patch)
2021-06-04 12:21 UTC, Benjamin Réveillé 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-05-12 06:35:52 UTC 
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/

Issue: sci-visualization/paraview-5.9.0 fails to compile with gcc-11.
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: ci)

NOTE:
This machine uses GCC-11: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-05-12 06:35:54 UTC 
Created attachment 707241 [details]
build.log.xz

build log and emerge --info (compressed because it exceeds attachment limit, use 'xzless' to read it)
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2021-05-12 06:35:56 UTC 
Possible context of error(s):

/var/tmp/portage/sci-visualization/paraview-5.9.0/work/ParaView-v5.9.0/VTK/Rendering/Core/vtkColorTransferFunction.cxx:1874:26: error: ‘numeric_limits’ is not a member of ‘std’
Comment 3 Benjamin Réveillé 2021-06-03 20:39:59 UTC 
Exact same error in sci-visualization/paraview-5.9.1

/var/tmp/portage/sci-visualization/paraview-5.9.1/work/ParaView-v5.9.1/VTK/Rendering/Core/vtkColorTransferFunction.cxx: Dans la fonction membre « double vtkColorTransferFunction::FindMinimumXDistance() »:
/var/tmp/portage/sci-visualization/paraview-5.9.1/work/ParaView-v5.9.1/VTK/Rendering/Core/vtkColorTransferFunction.cxx:1874:26: erreur: « numeric_limits » n'est pas un membre de « std »
 1874 |   double distance = std::numeric_limits<double>::max();
      |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/var/tmp/portage/sci-visualization/paraview-5.9.1/work/ParaView-v5.9.1/VTK/Rendering/Core/vtkColorTransferFunction.cxx:1874:41: erreur: expected primary-expression before « double »
 1874 |   double distance = std::numeric_limits<double>::max();
      |                                         ^~~~~~
Comment 4 Benjamin Réveillé 2021-06-04 12:21:54 UTC 
Created attachment 713574 [details, diff]
gcc11.patch

With this patch ebuild emerges fine

Just drop it in /etc/portage/patches/sci-visualization/Paraview-5.9.1/
Comment 5 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-06-13 17:19:06 UTC 
(In reply to Benjamin Réveillé from comment #4)
> Created attachment 713574 [details, diff] [details, diff]
> gcc11.patch
> 
> With this patch ebuild emerges fine
> 
> Just drop it in /etc/portage/patches/sci-visualization/Paraview-5.9.1/

Thanks!
Comment 6 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2021-06-13 17:58:31 UTC 
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c3dc785bbc6000bc1ad0c48a10f3877404e046da

commit c3dc785bbc6000bc1ad0c48a10f3877404e046da
Author:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2021-06-13 16:32:01 +0000
Commit:     Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2021-06-13 17:13:52 +0000

    sci-visualization/paraview: fix build for GCC 11
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/789573
    Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>

 .../files/paraview-5.9.0-gcc11-include.patch        | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
Comment 7 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2021-06-15 03:22:30 UTC 
*** Bug 794124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***