Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 97422 - I wrongly get "<net-ftp/vsftpd-2.0.3-r1 (is blocking net-ftp/ftpbase-0.00)"
Summary: I wrongly get "<net-ftp/vsftpd-2.0.3-r1 (is blocking net-ftp/ftpbase-0.00)"
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 79606
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Server (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Other
: High major (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
: 97534 100783 ghostpcl 104724 157345 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Reported: 2005-06-29 14:26 UTC by Peter Thomassen
Modified: 2006-12-06 09:49 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Peter Thomassen 2005-06-29 14:26:17 UTC
as you see, vsftpd is to be upgraded to 2.0.3-r1 which is not "<2.0.3-r1". Portage wrongly considers vsftpd to be blocking ftpbase. Installing ftpbase manually doesn't work.

tux peter # emerge -atv vsftpd

These are the packages that I would merge, in reverse order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[blocks B     ] <net-ftp/vsftpd-2.0.3-r1 (is blocking net-ftp/ftpbase-0.00)
[ebuild     U ] net-ftp/vsftpd-2.0.3-r1 [2.0.3] +pam +ssl +tcpd -xinetd 149 kB
[ebuild  N    ]  net-ftp/ftpbase-0.00  +pam 0 kB

Total size of downloads: 149 kB

!!! Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be installed
!!!        on the same system.

tux peter #  

tux peter # emerge info
Portage (default-linux/x86/2005.0, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r0, 2.6.11-gentoo-r8 i686)
System uname: 2.6.11-gentoo-r8 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.12
ccache version 2.4 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5, 2.4.1-r1
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.9
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r7
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.5
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.18
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=athlon-xp -pipe"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/web2c /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=athlon-xp -pipe"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks fixpackages sfperms strict"
USE="x86 3dnow alsa apache2 apm arts avi bitmap-fonts cdparanoia cdr crypt cups dba directfb dvd emboss fam foomaticdb ftp gd gdbm gif imagemagick imap imlib jabber jpeg kde kdeenablefinal libg++ libwww mad maildir mikmod mmx mp3 mpeg mysqli nls nomotif nptl nptlonly nvidia ogg oggvorbis opengl pam pdflib php pic png posix qt readline scanner sdl sqlite sse ssl svga tcpd tetex tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode userlocales vorbis xml2 xv zlib video_cards_nvidia linguas_de userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"

tux peter #
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-29 14:39:34 UTC
Unmerge the old vsftpd version and emerge the new one. Portage is working OK.

DEPEND="pam? ( || ( virtual/pam sys-libs/pam ) )
Comment 2 Peter Thomassen 2005-06-29 14:46:44 UTC
I think it is not working ok because the upgrade function aborts with the error 
I mentioned, but unmerging the old version an reemerging the new basically _is_ 
an upgrade. 
So why doesn't Portage ignore those dependency pseudo errors which are 
automatically solved after an upgrade? Why do I have to intervene? 
I first thougt this was a typo in ftpbase-0.00.ebuild which is why I assigned 
this to component Server, but I really think Portage could handle this in a 
better way. 
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-29 15:02:47 UTC
Comment 4 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-29 15:03:28 UTC
See Bug 79606. Portage won't handle this for you, sorry.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 79606 ***
Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-30 13:25:32 UTC
*** Bug 97534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-30 01:02:39 UTC
*** Bug 100783 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-12 00:33:42 UTC
*** Bug 102182 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-03 11:55:15 UTC
*** Bug 104724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-12-06 09:49:08 UTC
*** Bug 157345 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***