Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 93974 - clamav needs to be marked stable - current gentoo stable is blocked upstream
Summary: clamav needs to be marked stable - current gentoo stable is blocked upstream
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 92410
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Other
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Net-Mail Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-05-25 10:47 UTC by Michael Cummings (RETIRED)
Modified: 2005-05-25 20:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Cummings (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-25 10:47:03 UTC
clamav is only unmasked up to 0.83 - but when you update your signatures, you are informed from upstream that you have to update or go away. (see below output).

ClamAV update process started at Wed May 25 13:39:52 2005
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately!
WARNING: Local version: 0.83 Recommended version: 0.85.1
main.cvd is up to date (version: 31, sigs: 33079, f-level: 4, builder: tkojm)
Downloading daily.cvd [*]
daily.cvd updated (version: 894, sigs: 1660, f-level: 5, builder: trog)
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately!
WARNING: Current functionality level = 4, required = 5
Database updated (34739 signatures) from database.clamav.net (IP: 209.204.175.217)
Comment 1 Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-25 12:42:07 UTC
Read my comments in bug #92410

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 92410 ***
Comment 2 Michael Cummings (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-25 19:04:09 UTC
Thanks - not sure why this failed to show up as a dup when searching for open 
bugs about clamav (maybe the resolve later...) 
Comment 3 Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-05-25 20:06:08 UTC
Yes, looks like RESO LATER is considered as closed - see the strikethrough font
on bug number above. I, on the other hand, don't consider it closed. :)