Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 900292 - net-misc/minidlna-1.3.3 has implicit function declarations in configure logs (GCC-13-SYSTEM)
Summary: net-misc/minidlna-1.3.3 has implicit function declarations in configure logs ...
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Michał Górny
Depends on:
Blocks: implicit-in-configure
  Show dependency tree
Reported: 2023-03-08 08:22 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2023-06-01 07:14 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

build.log (build.log,68.30 KB, text/plain)
2023-03-08 08:22 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-03-08 08:22:27 UTC

Issue: net-misc/minidlna-1.3.2-r1 has implicit function declarations in configure logs (GCC-13-SYSTEM).
Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: gcc13_tinderbox)

(GCC-13-SYSTEM) in the summary means that the bug was found on a machine that runs gcc-13 but this bug MAY or MAY NOT BE related to the new compiler
See also:
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-03-08 08:22:29 UTC
Created attachment 856726 [details]

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2023-06-01 07:10:33 UTC
ci has reproduced this issue with version 1.3.3 - Updating summary.
Comment 3 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-06-01 07:14:53 UTC
 * QA Notice: Found the following implicit function declarations in configure logs:
 *   /var/tmp/portage/net-misc/minidlna-1.3.2-r1/work/minidlna-1.3.2/config.log:3922 - sendfile
 *   /var/tmp/portage/net-misc/minidlna-1.3.2-r1/work/minidlna-1.3.2/config.log:4058 - sendfile
 * Check that no features were accidentally disabled.


checking for linux sendfile support... yes
checking for darwin sendfile support... no
checking for freebsd sendfile support... no

so this is probably fine. But the check could be made to short circuit to avoid the noise.