------------------------------------------------------------------- This is an unstable amd64 chroot image at a tinderbox (==build bot) name: 13.0-systemd_20170625-200344 ------------------------------------------------------------------- gcc-config -l: [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-6.3.0 * Available Python interpreters, in order of preference: [1] python3.4 [2] python3.5 (fallback) [3] python2.7 (fallback) Available Ruby profiles: [1] ruby21 (with Rubygems) * [2] ruby22 (with Rubygems) java-config: The following VMs are available for generation-2:
Created attachment 480230 [details] emerge-info.txt
Created attachment 480232 [details] dev-perl:MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.160.0:20170703-025433.log
Created attachment 480234 [details] emerge-history.txt
Created attachment 480236 [details] environment
Created attachment 480238 [details] etc.portage.tbz2
Created attachment 480240 [details] temp.tbz2
t/01_basic.t ................ 9/? Attribute (loc) does not pass the type constraint because: Validation failed for 'DateTime::Locale' with value DateTime::Locale::FromData=HASH(0x2b829a8) (not isa DateTime::Locale::root) at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.24.1/x86_64-linux/Moose/Object.pm line 24 Moose::Object::new('Gorch', 'loc', 'he_IL') called at t/01_basic.t line 104 # Looks like your test exited with 2 just after 16. t/01_basic.t ................ Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) Using regression analysis: http://analysis.cpantesters.org/solved?distv=MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.16 Turns out this failure occurs 100% of the time if: - DateTime::Locale is newer than version 0.93 - DateTime is newer than 1.33 ( Which causes a hard upgrade of DateTime::Locale to >= 1.05
*** Bug 636496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
We may simply look at treecleaning this soon, its undermaintained(irony!) and there might be an argument to "just use" the more standard versions of this. It only has one revdep: dev-perl/MooseX-Types-DateTimeX And it in turn has no reverse dependencies. But I'll have to look at comparing their features before I consider this deprecated and masked.
