Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 519182 - dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin-1.7.0.72 version bump
Summary: dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin-1.7.0.72 version bump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Java (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal with 2 votes (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 519538 519576 520682 521376 527276 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-08-06 08:03 UTC by Tiziano Müller (RETIRED)
Modified: 2014-11-04 18:14 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
.65 -> .67 patch (oracle-jdk-upgrade-.65_to_.67.ebuild,1.01 KB, patch)
2014-08-09 23:31 UTC, Paweł Stankowski
Details | Diff
Manifest update (Manifest,6.12 KB, text/plain)
2014-08-09 23:34 UTC, Paweł Stankowski
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tiziano Müller (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-08-06 08:03:59 UTC
According to the release notes this fixes a regression introduced when fixing a security bug in 1.7.0.65. We therefore can not roll-out 1.7.0.65 in production and it would therefore be nice if this could be handled like a security bug (wrt grace-time for stabilization)
Comment 1 Matthew Marlowe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-08-06 18:54:25 UTC
Also, the download url for 1.7.0.65 binaries is now redirecting to 1.7.0.67 binaries which makes it more difficult to install the older ebuild.
Comment 2 David Mohr 2014-08-07 20:05:05 UTC
Please also update dev-java/java-sdk-docs, because 1.7.0.60 also now redirects to 7u67. Thanks!
Comment 3 Paweł Stankowski 2014-08-09 23:31:10 UTC
Created attachment 382604 [details, diff]
.65 -> .67 patch
Comment 4 Paweł Stankowski 2014-08-09 23:34:42 UTC
Created attachment 382606 [details]
Manifest update

New Manifest entries for all downloads of update 67.
Comment 5 Brian Evans Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev 2014-08-10 01:15:55 UTC
*** Bug 519538 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Ben Kohler gentoo-dev 2014-08-10 16:16:06 UTC
*** Bug 519576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Paweł Stankowski 2014-08-17 20:04:30 UTC
Version bump made on 10th August - 1.7.0.67 is now available as unstable. Should this bug be updated?
Comment 8 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2014-08-23 10:34:34 UTC
*** Bug 520682 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Johann Schmitz (ercpe) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-08-28 16:19:17 UTC
*** Bug 521376 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Johann Schmitz (ercpe) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-08-28 16:21:23 UTC
The download info in should also point to the archive page (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/archive-139210.html) to avoid bug reports when the latest version isn't in portage.
Comment 11 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2014-08-31 12:31:15 UTC
(In reply to Johann Schmitz (ercpe) from comment #10)
> The download info in should also point to the archive page
> (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/archive-139210.html) to avoid bug
> reports when the latest version isn't in portage.

That page requires the user to navigate to the correct version they need to download and could be confusing to some.
Comment 12 Johann Schmitz (ercpe) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-08-31 15:15:57 UTC
(In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #11)
> That page requires the user to navigate to the correct version they need to
> download and could be confusing to some.

Well, than to the sub pages for Java SE 7 / 8.
Comment 13 Sven 2014-10-09 20:51:04 UTC
1.7.0.67 is in portage right now, but it fails to unpack for me even though the checksum test passes. Is it failing for anybody else?
Comment 14 Oschtan 2014-10-16 16:47:31 UTC
(In reply to Sven from comment #13)
> 1.7.0.67 is in portage right now, but it fails to unpack for me even though
> the checksum test passes. Is it failing for anybody else?

Same problem
Comment 15 Sven 2014-10-16 17:47:57 UTC
(In reply to Oschtan from comment #14)
> (In reply to Sven from comment #13)
> > 1.7.0.67 is in portage right now, but it fails to unpack for me even though
> > the checksum test passes. Is it failing for anybody else?
> 
> Same problem

Then you might want to check the permission of the file. In my case, I had to chown portage and chmod a+r the files. Apparently, the checksum checks run as root and the unpacking as the portage user.
Comment 16 Kent Fredric (IRC: kent\n) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-10-16 19:06:27 UTC
Re: Unpack, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=491264 seems to be a better bug for that.
Comment 17 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-10-28 20:50:14 UTC
*** Bug 527276 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Johann Schmitz (ercpe) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-11-01 07:10:20 UTC
+*oracle-jdk-bin-1.7.0.71 (01 Nov 2014)
+
+  01 Nov 2014; Johann Schmitz <ercpe@gentoo.org>
+  +oracle-jdk-bin-1.7.0.71.ebuild:
+  Oracle JDK update to latest cpu release
Comment 19 Johann Schmitz (ercpe) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-11-04 18:14:44 UTC
+  04 Nov 2014; Johann Schmitz <ercpe@gentoo.org>
+  +emul-linux-x86-java-1.7.0.72.ebuild:
+  Version bump to 1.7.0.72

+  04 Nov 2014; Johann Schmitz <ercpe@gentoo.org>
+  +oracle-jre-bin-1.7.0.72.ebuild:
+  Version bump to 1.7.0.72

+  04 Nov 2014; Johann Schmitz <ercpe@gentoo.org>
+  +oracle-jdk-bin-1.7.0.72.ebuild:
+  Version bump to 1.7.0.72 (bug #519182)


+  04 Nov 2014; Johann Schmitz <ercpe@gentoo.org> +java-sdk-docs-1.7.0.72.ebuild:
+  Version bump to 1.7.0.72