Split off from bug 465554. The package is currently labelled "as-is", but I cannot find any license in its distfile or on its homepage. Unless someone can provide information on its distribution terms, I suggest that we change it to LICENSE="all-rights-reserved" and add mirror and bindist restriction.
mail sent.
(In reply to Justin Lecher from comment #1) > mail sent. Any reply?
(In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #2) > (In reply to Justin Lecher from comment #1) > > mail sent. > > Any reply? Sadly no. Let's drop to to arr
I've found this: http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.license.html It doesn't give you any rights that you don't already have, but tries to take away some of them: "You may not de-compile, disassemble, reverse engineer, or modify the software." Presumably, this clause is not enforceable (but IANAL). In any case, I suggest that we add a new "trf" license file. Questions to licenses team: - Does this qualify for the EULA licenses group? - The download page says: "Please read our License Terms before downloading." Do we need fetch restriction, or is mirror restriction sufficient?
Fixed, LICENSE="trf" now. I had to update SRC_URI because upstream has dropped the .exe suffix. The checksum of the file is unchanged, though. (Renamed back to trf404.linux.exe in src_unpack, so that the name of the installed file doesn't change.) Not added to @EULA, for the time being, because I don't see their "please read" as a requirement to read it (but IANAL). Feel free to reopen if you disagree.
(In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #5) > Not added to @EULA, for the time being, because I don't see their "please > read" as a requirement to read it (but IANAL). Feel free to reopen if you > disagree. For the same reason, only mirror restriction but no fetch restriction.
I agree completely with Ulrich.
