Bug 436332 – sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97 should depend on sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools (configure: error: thin_check not found in path)

• Status: RESOLVED INVALID
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description tokiclover 2012-09-26 17:47:22 UTC]

I'm just trying to rebuild this package (because I moved to udev::udev) and the configure phase just fails badly:

checking whether to include thin provisioning... internal
checking for thin_check... no
configure: error: thin_check not found in path /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.3:/usr/lib64/subversion/bin

sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools dependency is installed:
% ls -alh /sbin/thin_check                                                                
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 223K Sep 21 23:36 /sbin/thin_check

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge sys-fs/lvm2
2.
3.
Actual Results:  
configure: error: thin_check not found in path 

Expected Results:  
configure

[Comment 1 tokiclover 2012-09-26 17:47:59 UTC]

Created attachment 325050 [details]
build.log

[Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2012-09-26 18:06:30 UTC]

configure: error: thin_check not found in path /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.3:/usr/lib64/subversion/bin

!!! Please attach the following file when seeking support:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97/work/LVM2.2.02.97/config.log

Please do.

[Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2012-09-26 18:08:39 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> !!! Please attach the following file when seeking support:
> !!! /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97/work/LVM2.2.02.97/config.log

Never mind.

The RDEPEND is there, of course, so why is thin_check needed at build time?

[Comment 4 tokiclover 2012-09-26 18:08:42 UTC]

Created attachment 325056 [details]
config.log

/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97/work/LVM2.2.02.97/config.log config file.

[Comment 5 tokiclover 2012-09-26 18:12:01 UTC]

I have no idea why the binay is not found in path... I looked to the ebuild and the dependency is there. The only thing that could be tested is adding `--with-thin-check=/sbin'. I do not understad the `internal' world in that case as it is a `shared' binary.

[Comment 6 tokiclover 2012-09-28 10:33:47 UTC]

issue soleved... i reinstalled my system recently because system breakages due, mainly, to filesystem corruption. and some system wide directory had wrong permission resulting to not be able to access some directories. this issues was one of the many related issue. 
marked as solved.

[Comment 7 Robin Johnson 2012-09-28 18:05:31 UTC]

Closing, user had system corruption

[Comment 8 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2012-12-25 16:46:13 UTC]

*** Bug 448354 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 9 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2012-12-25 16:50:25 UTC]

No no, that's a valid one.

[Comment 10 Robin Johnson 2013-01-17 23:41:39 UTC]

No, this is the invalid one, the user system was whacked. thin_check existed

[Comment 11 Dennis Schridde 2013-01-18 08:22:25 UTC]

(In reply to comment #10)
> No, this is the invalid one, the user system was whacked. thin_check existed
I reopened the other one.