Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 295584 - sci-biology/ncbi-tools: hardcoded path to seg(1) is wrong
Summary: sci-biology/ncbi-tools: hardcoded path to seg(1) is wrong
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Science Biology related packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: PMASKED
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-12-03 20:04 UTC by Martin Mokrejš
Modified: 2021-08-31 21:25 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Mokrejš 2009-12-03 20:04:03 UTC
It seems to me seg-based filtering or low-complexity regions in BLAST cannot work. I see using:

$ strings /usr/bin/blastpgp | less
[cut]
BLASTFILTER
seg 
%s%s%s%s%s
/usr/ncbi/blast/filter
Call to seg failed.
^z
$ ls -la /usr/ncbi/blast/filter
ls: cannot access /usr/ncbi/blast/filter: No such file or directory
$ ls -la /usr/share/ncbi             
total 16
drwxr-xr-x   4 root root 4096 Apr 18  2008 .
drwxr-xr-x 139 root root 4096 Dec  2 03:56 ..
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root 4096 Dec  2 02:03 data
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root 4096 Apr 18  2008 formatdb
$
Comment 1 Martin Mokrejš 2009-12-03 20:41:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> It seems to me seg-based filtering or low-complexity regions in BLAST cannot
                         ------------of (was a typo, sorry)
> work. I see using:
Comment 2 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-02-17 09:55:00 UTC
So what should we do here? There are no filter installed. What does upstream intend? Do one need to download them seperately?
Comment 3 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2021-08-30 17:39:06 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=59b2be273d92b67c4c7f581657151a5e7cbb63ae

commit 59b2be273d92b67c4c7f581657151a5e7cbb63ae
Author:     Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2021-08-30 17:17:23 +0000
Commit:     Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2021-08-30 17:38:50 +0000

    sci-biology/ncbi-tools: Remove last-rited package
    
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/649930
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/782790
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741188
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/715636
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/710338
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/701340
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/586982
    Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/295584
    Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org>

 profiles/package.mask                              |   6 -
 sci-biology/ncbi-tools/Manifest                    |   1 -
 sci-biology/ncbi-tools/files/21ncbi-r1             |   6 -
 .../files/ncbi-tools-2.2.26-_DEFAULT_SOURCE.patch  |  81 ----------
 .../files/ncbi-tools-2.2.26-bfr-overflow.patch     | 103 -------------
 .../files/ncbi-tools-2.2.26-format-security.patch  | 124 ---------------
 .../ncbi-tools/files/ncbi-tools-extra_vib.patch    |  37 -----
 sci-biology/ncbi-tools/files/ncbi-tools-lop.patch  |  15 --
 sci-biology/ncbi-tools/files/ncbirc                |   2 -
 sci-biology/ncbi-tools/metadata.xml                |   8 -
 sci-biology/ncbi-tools/ncbi-tools-2.2.26-r3.ebuild | 169 ---------------------
 11 files changed, 552 deletions(-)
Comment 4 Martin Mokrejš 2021-08-31 21:09:12 UTC
It is still developed, see https://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/toolbox/ncbi_tools++/ARCHIVE/2021/Aug_18_2021/README.html , albeit in c++. However, for those of use who have issues on some hosts to get that compiled, we were happy to use an older implementation in C.

Why didn't you just just go the --without-x or --disable-x way? Why dropping the whole bundle?

Please restore the package.
Comment 5 Jakov Smolić archtester gentoo-dev 2021-08-31 21:25:39 UTC
(In reply to Martin Mokrejš from comment #4)
> It is still developed, see
> https://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/toolbox/ncbi_tools++/ARCHIVE/2021/Aug_18_2021/
> README.html , albeit in c++. However, for those of use who have issues on
> some hosts to get that compiled, we were happy to use an older
> implementation in C.
> 
> Why didn't you just just go the --without-x or --disable-x way? Why dropping
> the whole bundle?
> 
> Please restore the package.


Please see https://bugs.gentoo.org/701340#c13