Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 287147 - wrong location specified for make.conf.example
Summary: wrong location specified for make.conf.example
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 279889
Alias: None
Product: [OLD] Docs on www.gentoo.org
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Installation Handbook (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Docs Team
URL: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-09-30 19:20 UTC by John Christian Stoddart (RETIRED)
Modified: 2009-09-30 19:41 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
patch to modify location of make.conf.example (hb-install-stage.xml.patch,798 bytes, patch)
2009-09-30 19:26 UTC, John Christian Stoddart (RETIRED) 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description John Christian Stoddart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-09-30 19:20:31 UTC 
File make.conf.example has been moved to the /usr/share/portage/config directory but the <note> in section 5d Configure the Compile Options still reflects the former location in the /etc directory.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 John Christian Stoddart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-09-30 19:26:02 UTC 
Created attachment 205726 [details, diff]
patch to modify location of make.conf.example
Comment 2 John Christian Stoddart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-09-30 19:27:15 UTC 
Original report by eagle eyed user Gustavo Delfino.
Comment 3 Alex Legler (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2009-09-30 19:28:57 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Original report by eagle eyed user Gustavo Delfino.
> 

Sorry, but eagle-eyed a3li already reported it. ;)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 279889 ***
Comment 4 John Christian Stoddart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-09-30 19:41:53 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Sorry, but eagle-eyed a3li already reported it. ;)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 279889 ***

Heh, good call! I wonder why it hasn't been taken care of yet ...