Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 282291 - =dev-python/gnome-python-extras-2.19.1-r3 ~x86-fbsd keyword request
Summary: =dev-python/gnome-python-extras-2.19.1-r3 ~x86-fbsd keyword request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo/BSD Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: KEYWORDREQ
Depends on: 227917
Blocks: 282293
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-08-22 10:09 UTC by Robert Buchholz (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-03-22 20:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Robert Buchholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-08-22 10:09:20 UTC
We have =dev-python/gnome-python-extras-2.14.2-r1 keyworded ~bsd, but no later version per:

  05 Jul 2007; Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org>
  gnome-python-extras-2.14.2.ebuild, gnome-python-extras-2.14.2-r1.ebuild:
  Keyworded ~x86-fbsd.

Please keyword the most recent version or remove the keywords on the old version.
Comment 1 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2009-08-25 13:20:29 UTC
Guess this would never have been fixed since I couldnt find any other bug report asking for keywording...

I've done all but:
- libgda-python, it requires libgda:3 which fails to build because of a broken bundled sqlite3 copy. We'll likely have to wait for a libgda:4 version.
- xulrunner 1.9 enabled gtkmozembed-python. We're stuck with xulrunner 1.8 until, I hope, xulrunner 1.9.2.
Comment 2 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-08-26 20:05:48 UTC
looks like we indeed missed bsd, sorry about that guys. If libgda is a problem, then I might consider adding use flags to this ebuild as requested per bug #108479 (originaly) so you'd be able to use.mask it. What do you think about that ?
Comment 3 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2009-10-15 11:49:35 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> looks like we indeed missed bsd, sorry about that guys. If libgda is a problem,
> then I might consider adding use flags to this ebuild as requested per bug
> #108479 (originaly) so you'd be able to use.mask it. What do you think about
> that ?

Seems I forgot to answer here... useflags & masking them would work for us.
Maybe it would be better to just drop g-p-extras 2.14 since 2.19 is just a meta package and nothing should depend on it (maybe i'm wrong there though).
Comment 4 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2010-03-22 20:55:06 UTC
Should be fixed in -r4, that includes "xulrunner" and "lingda" USE flags, both masked in x86-fbsd

Best regards