The current version of the CITRIX ICAclient. bumped the name and changed the RPM filename in the ebuild. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Created attachment 15962 [details] the ebuild
i dont use this and cant test it... please re-assign to an appropriate developer :|
installed ok for me: ebuild digest setup .... Someone capable will add this to portage tree?
in cvs
The old 6.30 rpm is still referred to in the ebuild: src_unpack() { # You must download ICAClient-6.30-1.i386.rpm # from www.citrix.com and put it in ${DISTDIR} rpm2cpio ${DISTDIR}/${A} | cpio -i --make-directories } Should be: src_unpack() { # You must download ICAClient-7.00-1.i386.rpm # from www.citrix.com and put it in ${DISTDIR} rpm2cpio ${DISTDIR}/${A} | cpio -i --make-directories }
Created attachment 19572 [details] DOH! here we go.
Though i don't really understand their scheme for labelling versions i only find 7.0x and 6.00.* versions on the downloadsite http://www.citrix.com/site/SS/downloads/details.asp?dID=2755&downloadID=3323 i think this version should therefore be marked stable (x86) as at least i am unable to download the package for the current stable 6.30-r1.
reopened bug because of comment #7
I've been using the 'unstable' v7 for several weeks on 5 gentoo boxes. Haven't had any problems with the emerge, and the client itself seems to work better than the old version 6.3. Recommend this be marked as stable.
Works nice here too.
There is already a new version out: http://download2.citrix.com/files/en/products/client/ica/current/ICAClient-8.0-1.i386.rpm Will create ebuild next days if nobody else does it...
This new ebuild for version 8.0 of the new icaclient needs to be written ASAP. Citrix has pulled all versions prior to 8.0, for their English version, making it impossible to emerge any ebuild that is currently in the portage tree.
Created attachment 33014 [details] icaclient-8.0.ebuild Installation works without any problems, BUT I get a segmentation fault when running the client. Anyone else more luck?
Can we remove fetch restriction? It is possible to access the file directly. Are there any license issues?
There are definitely licensing issues, as there are export restrictions placed on the file. This actually, needs to be RESOLVED, since there is a 7.0 client ebuild in portage. If you want the 8.0 client, look at bug #53300 instead.