Latest icaclient ebuilds don't work with any of the downlaodable files (version 8.0). Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Created attachment 32913 [details] Allows emerging of latest ICAClient (8.0) It seems to be working despite a few error messages from cpio that I don't know how to get rid of: cpio: usr/lib/ICAClient/Npica: No such file or directory cpio: usr/lib/ICAClient/Wfcmgr: No such file or directory cpio: usr/lib/ICAClient/Wfica: No such file or directory cpio: usr/lib/ICAClient/nls/C: No such file or directory cpio: usr/lib/ICAClient/util/XCapture: No such file or directory
*** Bug 53302 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
See attachment 33014 [details] for another working ebuild.
ICAClient 8.0 segfaults here. <snip> Starting program: /opt/ICAClient/wfica launch.asp.ica warning: Unable to find dynamic linker breakpoint function. GDB will be unable to debug shared library initializers and track explicitly loaded dynamic code. (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x40206751 in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x40206751 in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x40205f92 in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x4020520b in malloc () from /lib/libc.so.6 #3 0x080cb3d6 in MemMallocAlloc () #4 0x080cb21b in Mem_alloc () #5 0x08070030 in HostMalloc () #6 0x080c909a in CopySection () #7 0x080717e5 in ReadINIConfig () #8 0x08105f31 in HostInit () #9 0x0806f689 in OldMain () #10 0x081075f4 in PlatAppMain () #11 0x080de39b in AppMain () #12 0x0810759d in main () </snip> Portage 2.0.50-r8 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.3.3, glibc-2.2.5-r2,2.3.3.20040420-r0, 2.6.6) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.6 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 Mobile CPU 1.80GHz Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16 Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r3 Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.3 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" COMPILER="gcc3" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /etc/tomcat /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="autoaddcvs ccache fixpackages sandbox" GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://ftp.solnet.ch/mirror/Gentoo http://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/gentoo/ http://linux.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/download/gentoo-mirror/ http://gentoo.inode.at/" MAKEOPTS="-j2" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage.local" SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="X aalib acpi alsa apm avi berkdb bonobo cdr crypt cups dga directfb dvd encode esd ethereal fbcon foomaticdb gdbm ggi gif gphoto2 gpm gtk gtk2 gtkhtml guile imlib ipv6 java jpeg libg++ libwww mad mikmod motif mozilla mpeg mysql ncurses nls oggvorbis opengl oss pam pcmcia pda pdflib perl png pnp python qt quicktime readline samba sdl slang spell sse ssl svga tcltk tcpd tiff truetype trusted usb x86 xface xfs xml xml2 xmms xv zlib" (same on kernel 2.4.25) See these two bug reports from debian and redhat (for version 7 of icaclient I believe): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=206177 http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101385
I'm just curious, but why are both of you still using the RPM? Does that not also add additional dependencies that are no longer needed since there is a tarball available?
here's the url http://download2.citrix.com/files/en/products/client/ica/current/linuxx86.tar.gz
The installer in the tar is not working for me. But it anyway uses cpio to extract the files, so it not really makes a difference. (And it's not fixing the error from comment 4 too)
Resolving as fixed as I added 8.0 into the tree before I saw this. Chris, if you are still interested in having the tar version used over the RPM, open another bug and assign it to me.
