Hi, due to bug #198233 I've removed feynmf from texlive packaging and added dev-tex/feynmf as a dep of the meta texlive ebuild. It should have been done earlier, but well... In consequent, I had to drop following keywords for -r1: ~alpha ~ia64 ~ppc64 ~sparc ccing ulm as he's feynmf maintainer and might want to know what's going on.
Arch teams, please keyword dev-tex/feynmf-1.08-r2 and app-text/texlive-2007-r1.
Both are ~sparc --- texlive-2007 is able to build all of feynmf documentation, and this is a bootstrap process: The documentation for the package requires that the feynmf package works with the version of TeX that's installed, because the documentation has Feynman diagrams in it.
(In reply to comment #2) > texlive-2007 is able to build all of feynmf documentation, and this is a > bootstrap process: The documentation for the package requires that the > feynmf package works with the version of TeX that's installed, because the > documentation has Feynman diagrams in it. Nice, isn't it? ;) Test plan: emerge with USE=doc. You should be fine if the figures in the fmfcnl*.ps files (installed in /usr/share/doc/${PF}/) look like the ones in <http://wwwa1.kph.uni-mainz.de/users/ulm/feynmf/tutorial/>. (Never mind different page numbers or undefined references.)
*** Bug 198350 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
~alpha/~ia64 done
added ~ppc64
I still have this problem despite daily syncing with portage.
(In reply to comment #7) > I still have this problem despite daily syncing with portage. > it has nothing to do with that bug, check my comment on the other one
