Bug 183520 – net-analyzer/wireshark < 0.99.6 multiple vulnerabilities (CVE-2007-3389, 3390, 3391, 3392, 3393)

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Security

[Description Tony Vroon (RETIRED) 2007-06-28 13:21:13 UTC]

#

Wireshark could crash when dissecting an HTTP chunked response. (Bug 1394)

Versions affected: 0.99.5

#

On some systems, Wireshark could crash while reading iSeries capture files. (Bug 1415)

Versions affected: 0.10.14 to 0.99.5

#

Wireshark could exhaust system memory while reading a malformed DCP ETSI packet. (Bug 1264)

Versions affected: 0.99.5

#

Wireshark could loop excessively while reading a malformed SSL packet. (Bug 1582)

Versions affected: ?

#

The DHCP/BOOTP dissector was susceptible to an off-by-one error. (Bug 1416)

Versions affected: ?

#

Wireshark could loop excessively while reading a malformed MMS packet. (Bug 1382)

Versions affected: ?

[Comment 1 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2007-06-28 13:36:32 UTC]

*** Bug 183521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 2 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2007-06-28 14:45:03 UTC]

no reason to restrict this bug

[Comment 3 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2007-06-29 21:11:36 UTC]

netmon please advise and patch as necessary.

[Comment 4 Markus Ullmann (RETIRED) 2007-07-06 16:11:39 UTC]

Bumped in CVS though I'd be happy for another pair of eyes first if all security issues are really fixed...

[Comment 5 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2007-07-15 07:46:36 UTC]

Seems like mostly minor issues. Anyways.

Arches please test and mark stable. Target keywords are:

wireshark-0.99.6.ebuild:KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd"

[Comment 6 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2007-07-15 16:48:58 UTC]

pva has the patch for the --as-needed failure...so we could wait until he adds it...

[Comment 7 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2007-07-15 18:08:06 UTC]

Back to ebuild awaiting patch.

[Comment 8 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2007-07-15 20:27:38 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> Back to ebuild awaiting patch.
> 

I've just fixed the issue with asneeded so it should be ok to proceed.

[Comment 9 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2007-07-16 15:34:12 UTC]

sparc stable.

[Comment 10 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2007-07-16 16:45:19 UTC]

alpha/ia64/x86 stable

[Comment 11 Marcus D. Hanwell (RETIRED) 2007-07-16 18:57:01 UTC]

Stable on amd64.

[Comment 12 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2007-07-16 18:59:05 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 13 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2007-07-16 22:38:31 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 14 Tobias Scherbaum (RETIRED) 2007-07-20 18:31:40 UTC]

ppc stable - time for glsa voting

[Comment 15 Pierre-Yves Rofes (RETIRED) 2007-07-20 20:57:29 UTC]

although it's mainly minor issues like Jaervosz pointed out, there's still the off-by-one error, which means possible remote code execution, so I vote YES.

[Comment 16 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2007-07-22 07:33:26 UTC]

I tend to vote YES.

[Comment 17 Matt Drew (RETIRED) 2007-07-24 10:55:44 UTC]

Two yes votes = glsa request.

CVE-2007-3389
CVE-2007-3390
CVE-2007-3391
CVE-2007-3392
CVE-2007-3393

[Comment 18 Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) 2007-08-16 22:06:11 UTC]

GLSA 200708-12!