Bug 146037 – app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs update for openssl-0.9.8b

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Harm Geerts 2006-09-02 13:12:52 UTC]

With the release of dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8b into ~amd64 app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs needs an update.

Currently the following libs depend on dev-libs/openssl-0.9.7j
/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libcups.so.2
/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libldap-2.2.so.7.0.21
/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libldap_r-2.2.so.7.0.21
/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libldap_r.so.2.0.130
/emul/linux/x86/usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.130

[Comment 1 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2006-09-02 13:15:46 UTC]

As long as it's not even stable there is no chance getting this into an emul package.

[Comment 2 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2006-09-09 23:17:43 UTC]

Now we have stable openssl-0.9.8, can this bug be reopened?

[Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-09-10 00:08:07 UTC]

Good idea...

[Comment 4 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2006-09-10 02:51:39 UTC]

Actually, 2.5.2 contains openssl-0.9.8c because lower versions of it were vulnerable. So this is fixed already :)

[Comment 5 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) 2006-09-10 02:54:58 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> Actually, 2.5.2 contains openssl-0.9.8c because lower versions of it were
> vulnerable. So this is fixed already :)

But other libraries in this package *link* against old openssl (check using revdep-rebuild).

[Comment 6 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-09-18 11:33:10 UTC]

Reopening, it's broken. :)

[Comment 7 Sandro Bonazzola (RETIRED) 2006-09-28 13:15:59 UTC]

I can confirm the bug. app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs should be rebuilt against the latest openssl lib.

[Comment 8 Sandro Bonazzola (RETIRED) 2006-09-28 13:18:54 UTC]

AMD64 people, herbs and kugelfang seems to be currently away, please act as herd s in their absence.

[Comment 9 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2006-10-09 01:21:29 UTC]

*** Bug 149992 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 10 Fabio Cavallo 2006-10-09 16:09:05 UTC]

app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs should be rebuilt against the latest zlib because in the lib not contain the gzdirect function. Sorry for my english.

[Comment 11 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-12-13 06:48:43 UTC]

*** Bug 158029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 12 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2007-02-12 14:00:26 UTC]

fixed in 10.0