Summary: | gnome-base/eel-2.24.1 does not compile against gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.30.0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michael Weber (RETIRED) <xmw> |
Component: | [OLD] GNOME | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | dkarasik, dliana, jarausch, maksbotan, rbachl |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | PMASKED |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | Pending Removal: 2010-08-12 | ||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 324109, 324165, 326159 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 313037 | ||
Attachments: |
see lines 230 and 231 for the error
build environment |
Description
Michael Weber (RETIRED)
2010-03-27 01:07:17 UTC
Created attachment 225401 [details]
see lines 230 and 231 for the error
Created attachment 225403 [details]
build environment
eel was merged into nautilus package a while ago and is deprecated as a separate package. Do you actually need eel for anything else? I think there are a few old packages in tree and we need to do something about that then (patch or getting rid of all eel users in tree). But maybe meanwhile you don't need eel on your machine, as there are and will be no newer eel releases as far as I know, so no new releases to include. (In reply to comment #3) > eel was merged into nautilus package a while ago and is deprecated as a > separate package. ok > Do you actually need eel for anything else? ... But maybe meanwhile you don't need eel only dependent package is gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner-2.24.0, which I've installed as +cdr for nautilus-sendto and rhythmbox (have brasero, too). > as there are and will be no newer eel releases as far as I know, so no > new releases to include. There is 2.26.0 version ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/eel/2.26/ An modified ebuild (cope of 2.24 tree version) with at least questionable patch is in my overlay at http://svn.xmw.de/gentoo-overlay/gnome-base/eel/ The patch just adds zero arguments and the references to the removed (?) gnome_bg_changes_with_size , leaving background->details->background_changes_with_size undefined. Well, the package itself and gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner compiles and /usr/bin/nautilus-cd-burner runs (havn't burned a cdr, jet). (In reply to comment #4) > An modified ebuild (cope of 2.24 tree version) with at least questionable patch > is in my overlay at http://svn.xmw.de/gentoo-overlay/gnome-base/eel/ > The patch just adds zero arguments and the references to the removed (?) > gnome_bg_changes_with_size , leaving > background->details->background_changes_with_size undefined. the definition of background->details->background_changes_with_size gets removed. 3am on a Saturday w/ bottle of wine is bad time to for grammar. There is a version 2.25.3 of nautilus-cd-burner at http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/nautilus-cd-burner/2.25/ . The CHANGELOG states "Remove tenious eel dependency". A renamed copy of nautilus-cd-burner-2.24.0 ebuild with removed eel DEPEND compiles and will be in my overlay in the minute. I hope that nautilus-cd-burner isn't deprecated, too. It sort of is deprecated in favour of brasero[nautilus] :) (In reply to comment #3) > ... we need to do something about that then (patch or getting > rid of all eel users in tree). I see following: app-editors/mlview-0.8-r1: Theres a newer 0.9.0 w/o direct eel dep from 2005 on http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/mlview/0.9/ , ebuild is at http://svn.xmw.de/gentoo-overlay/ but does not compile due to an internal problem. dev-cpp/glademm:2.4 was added. dev-python/nautilus-python-0.6.1: does state =gnome-base/eel-2.6 dep in ebuild, but was removed upstream as http://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus-python/commit/?id=bbfd1edcafadded353e8636a9a7759558205ee49 reads. That's it. (In reply to comment #7) > app-editors/mlview-0.8-r1: Theres a newer 0.9.0 w/o direct eel dep from 2005 on > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/mlview/0.9/ , ebuild is at > http://svn.xmw.de/gentoo-overlay/ but does not compile due to an internal > problem. dev-cpp/glademm:2.4 was added. fixed and reported as http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311573 > dev-python/nautilus-python-0.6.1: does state =gnome-base/eel-2.6 dep in ebuild, > but was removed upstream posted to http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301922#c2 n8 For revdep-rebuild to stop attempting to install gnome-base/eel I had to uninstall gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner and dev-python/nautilus-cd-burner-python *** Bug 320249 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** the bug is not solved and nobody stated that it wont be fixed. *** Bug 323979 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** equery depends eel shows nothing depending on eel, but revdep-rebuild still wants to bring it in -- and fails. (In reply to comment #13) > equery depends eel shows nothing depending on eel, but revdep-rebuild still > wants to bring it in -- and fails. This must be because an ELF file installed by eel is broken (missing needed lib) and revdep tries to fix eel by recompiling. Pleas run `quickpkg eel` to preserve you current installed version of eel, thenn remove it via `equery -a -depclean` or if that lists to much packages, just `emerge -aC eel`. Then run `revdep-rebuild --ignore --pretend` and it should be gone. (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > equery depends eel shows nothing depending on eel, but revdep-rebuild still > > wants to bring it in -- and fails. > > This must be because an ELF file installed by eel is broken (missing needed > lib) and revdep tries to fix eel by recompiling. Pleas run `quickpkg eel` to > preserve you current installed version of eel, thenn remove it via `equery -a > -depclean` or if that lists to much packages, just `emerge -aC eel`. Then run > `revdep-rebuild --ignore --pretend` and it should be gone. > BUT, gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner-2.24.0 still depends on eel, so it will be pulled in again! Please keep in mind that there are 3 release steps between nautilus-cd-burner-2.24 and Gnome 2.30. (in general mixes between stable versions and bleeding edge version were not supported) If you truly want to use nautilus-cd-burner, the 2.25.3 w/o eel and eel-2.26.0 is in my overlay at http://svn.xmw.de/websvn/gentoo-overlay/ . I really don't think gnome herd will bump the (in their opinion deprecated) nautilus-cd-burner or the moved-into-nautilus eel. forgot to mention bug 324109 , the bump request on nautilus-cd-burner (In reply to comment #16) > I really don't > think gnome herd will bump the (in their opinion deprecated) nautilus-cd-burner > or the moved-into-nautilus eel. > It's not only an "opinion" ;-), everybody can check that it's no longer developed: http://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus-cd-burner/log/ People should upgrade to brasero (In reply to comment #15) > BUT, gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner-2.24.0 still depends on eel, so it will > be pulled in again! (In reply to comment #18) > People should upgrade to brasero Can we please treeclean gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner and some of the gnome versions <2.28? (In reply to comment #19) > Can we please treeclean gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner and some of the gnome > versions <2.28? > I would like to see them masked for removal, but brasero is still not keyworded for sh and not stable on arm, while nautilus-cd-burner has versions with "arm sh" :-/ (In reply to comment #13) > equery depends eel shows nothing depending on eel, but revdep-rebuild still > wants to bring it in -- and fails. > Sorry, after my latest update, eel has been totally forgotten -- good! @herd, we should just remove all keywords on eel and rrdeps, maybe except for arm and sh. Dropped |