clang-20 is already enabled in -9999, but 25.2.* seems to work just fine as well (compile- and runtime tested without any issues on two machines). Please consider adding clang-20 to 25.2.* while they are still in ~arch. Reproducible: Always
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=65fb81e5c9c2fba626f0d7a6ede88e7ac2e97336 commit 65fb81e5c9c2fba626f0d7a6ede88e7ac2e97336 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2025-05-17 15:38:55 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2025-05-17 15:40:48 +0000 app-office/libreoffice: drop USE=clang It was added originally for Skia issues w/o Clang and we removed the warning for that a while ago: 326d52937573cf713dd070d23573b8deb5c9ede8. There's no need for any of this anymore. Users can set Clang via package.env if they really want. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/739134 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/915673 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/953422 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> .../libreoffice/libreoffice-25.2.9999.ebuild | 53 ++++---------------- app-office/libreoffice/libreoffice-9999.ebuild | 56 ++++------------------ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=3ce904a011acb82fb981146838f38f6d847f26cb commit 3ce904a011acb82fb981146838f38f6d847f26cb Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2025-05-20 19:08:47 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2025-05-20 19:08:47 +0000 app-office/libreoffice: drop USE=clang in 25.2.3.2 too As discussed with asturm, let's backport 65fb81e5c9c2fba626f0d7a6ede88e7ac2e97336. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/953422 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> app-office/libreoffice/libreoffice-25.2.3.2.ebuild | 53 ++++------------------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
