EAPI=6, maintainer-needed, incorrect LICENSE, fails to compile with clang. package list: net-mail/gnubiff
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1d423fdd8574b2490bc3f008180ec63c6e5d9888 commit 1d423fdd8574b2490bc3f008180ec63c6e5d9888 Author: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2024-05-31 08:44:08 +0000 Commit: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-05-31 08:44:08 +0000 net-mail/gnubiff: last-rite Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/933241 Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
I'm looking at this right now. The EAPI and LICENSE are easily resolved. I may need some help with the clang problem.
OK, let me know if you need me
(In reply to Phil Stracchino (Unix Ronin) from comment #2) > I'm looking at this right now. The EAPI and LICENSE are easily resolved. I > may need some help with the clang problem. Hi, 30 days window already passed. I'll give you a week extension.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=14f8c994b08a053132be5ecb2cc754e510da4938 commit 14f8c994b08a053132be5ecb2cc754e510da4938 Author: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2024-07-02 16:18:43 +0000 Commit: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2024-07-02 16:18:43 +0000 net-mail/gnubiff: extend by week last-rite Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/933241 Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
(In reply to Arthur Zamarin from comment #4) > (In reply to Phil Stracchino (Unix Ronin) from comment #2) > > I'm looking at this right now. The EAPI and LICENSE are easily resolved. I > > may need some help with the clang problem. > > Hi, 30 days window already passed. I'll give you a week extension. Sorry, I've been really busy with other things. Nobody ever contacted me back from maintainers-needed. I have a trivial patch to resolve the LICENSE and EAPI as soon as I have a place to submit it, and I'm unable to reproduce the compilation issue, which APPEARS to be caused by naively substituting clang into CC resulting in gcc options not supported by clang being passed to clang. I have no idea how to work around that.
Created attachment 896809 [details, diff] Trivial patch to resolve LICENSE and EAPI issues
(In reply to Phil Stracchino (Unix Ronin) from comment #6) > I have no idea how to work around > that. And forgot to add, "but I don't think that can fairly be said to be gnubiff's fault."
(In reply to Phil Stracchino (Unix Ronin) from comment #6) > (In reply to Arthur Zamarin from comment #4) > > (In reply to Phil Stracchino (Unix Ronin) from comment #2) > > > I'm looking at this right now. The EAPI and LICENSE are easily resolved. I > > > may need some help with the clang problem. > > > > Hi, 30 days window already passed. I'll give you a week extension. > > > Sorry, I've been really busy with other things. > > Nobody ever contacted me back from maintainers-needed. I don't think anyone looks at the mail for that. We try to look at the proxy-maint@ email but it gets buried. IRC is best.