Please report new bugs and have them block this one. @candrews: I think in future we should commit these p.masked and start a tracker immediately as they tend to break a lot. Does that sound ok?
(In reply to Sam James from comment #0) > Please report new bugs and have them block this one. > > @candrews: I think in future we should commit these p.masked and start a > tracker immediately as they tend to break a lot. Does that sound ok? Absolutely. Should we p.mask now, or wait?
(In reply to Craig Andrews from comment #1) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #0) > > Please report new bugs and have them block this one. > > > > @candrews: I think in future we should commit these p.masked and start a > > tracker immediately as they tend to break a lot. Does that sound ok? > > Absolutely. Should we p.mask now, or wait? I think let's mask it now actually, there's more than I expected this time too. I'll do it now, thank you!
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=5a7f6e70a391191a79c64e0eb95b5c806d7dbb26 commit 5a7f6e70a391191a79c64e0eb95b5c806d7dbb26 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-05-10 16:08:49 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-05-10 16:08:49 +0000 profiles: mask =dev-libs/libfmt-10.0.0 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/906077 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/906068 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/906071 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/906074 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/906075 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/906076 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/906069 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
