It seems that 'None' is getting treated literally somewhere: # gpkg-sign inkscape-1.2.1-r2-1.gpkg.tar !!! gpg: keyblock resource '/tmp/None/pubring.kbx': No such file or directory gpg: skipped "None": No secret key gpg: signing failed: No secret key * Signature exception: inkscape-1.2.1-r2-1.gpkg.tar
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=57ec5fc566a8e47fefad628fc61aa9a575341ff2 commit 57ec5fc566a8e47fefad628fc61aa9a575341ff2 Author: Sheng Yu <syu.os@protonmail.com> AuthorDate: 2022-09-14 10:01:02 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-09-20 03:39:23 +0000 gpkg-sign: add gpg configuration check Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/869470 Signed-off-by: Sheng Yu <syu.os@protonmail.com> Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/899 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> bin/gpkg-sign | 9 +++++++++ lib/_emerge/actions.py | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=041d1f125384dd935d058b555a0fcb6b260260cb commit 041d1f125384dd935d058b555a0fcb6b260260cb Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-09-23 03:27:14 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-09-23 03:27:14 +0000 sys-apps/portage: add 3.0.37 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/866197 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/869470 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/870229 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/870283 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/870310 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/871561 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> sys-apps/portage/Manifest | 1 + sys-apps/portage/portage-3.0.37.ebuild | 273 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 274 insertions(+)
