Thanks.
Do you want me to add '~amd64-linux' as a keyword to the latest version of this package, and, if so, should I add it in place or create a new '-r#' version?
(In reply to Wade Cline from comment #1) > Do you want me to add '~amd64-linux' as a keyword to the latest version of > this package, and, if so, should I add it in place or create a new '-r#' > version? Hey, no need to do anything on your end. Prefix people can restore it, although if it was dropped for no reason / the dependency is back, in theory we could just restore it.
I don't recall the reason for it being dropped; I *think* it may have been repoman complaining, but it was too long ago for me to remember.
(In reply to Wade Cline from comment #3) > I don't recall the reason for it being dropped; I *think* it may have been > repoman complaining, but it was too long ago for me to remember. Ah. This is because of: dev-libs/libmowgli/libmowgli-2.1.3-r2.ebuild: DEPEND: ~amd64-linux(default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/prefix/kernel-3.2+) ['dev-libs/openssl:0='] This is misleading because (for now) we have dev-libs/openssl in our overlay. https://bugs.gentoo.org/760806#c3 may be interesting as a summary of the rules too. Thanks!
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=a434ce2ae1ebce625d0fca917af68f18b540159c commit a434ce2ae1ebce625d0fca917af68f18b540159c Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-12-21 20:01:45 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-12-21 20:01:45 +0000 dev-libs/libmowgli: restore ~amd64-linux Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/759709 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> dev-libs/libmowgli/libmowgli-2.1.3-r2.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks for the link, I did a (re-?)read to make sure I'm up to speed.
