What do you think?
I think my question should first be answered in https://bugs.gentoo.org/726994#c3 as I was looking into stabilizing this as well.
(In reply to Joonas Niilola from comment #1) > I think my question should first be answered in > https://bugs.gentoo.org/726994#c3 as I was looking into stabilizing this as > well. Agreed. FWIW, I think 'persist' would work if Felix doesn't express a view.
Let's wait over the weekend, then rename the flag while pushing stabilization commits. So no one has to build it twice, albeit this is a small package.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=dc01de15c8d003e70065beb7c27bfeca253f3337 commit dc01de15c8d003e70065beb7c27bfeca253f3337 Author: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-11-03 11:56:12 +0000 Commit: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-11-03 11:57:14 +0000 app-admin/doas: rename 'timestamp' IUSE to 'persist' Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/751991 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/726994 Signed-off-by: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> app-admin/doas/doas-6.6.1.ebuild | 4 ++-- app-admin/doas/metadata.xml | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Sorry for the delay. I don't have any specific opinion about the use flag rename.
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=44ebc733d703d5aa30115de9b856275f70b1a95c commit 44ebc733d703d5aa30115de9b856275f70b1a95c Author: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-11-05 14:31:35 +0000 Commit: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-11-05 14:32:00 +0000 app-admin/doas: stabilize 6.6.1 on amd64 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/751991 Signed-off-by: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> app-admin/doas/doas-6.6.1.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
amd64 done.
arm done
arm64 done all arches done
