Created attachment 595212 [details] Output of emerge --info '=sys-libs/pam-1.3.0-r2::gentoo' I tried to emerge sys-libs/pam in a fresh-installed Gentoo Prefix. The profile "default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/prefix/kernel-3.2+" enables USE="pam", so many packages depends on sys-libs/pam. Finally sys-libs/pam failed during postinst phase, and the related command was "fcaps cap_dac_override sbin/unix_chkpwd".
Created attachment 595214 [details] Output of emerge -pqv '=sys-libs/pam-1.3.0-r2::gentoo'
Created attachment 595216 [details] Error message generated while emerging sys-libs/pam
Created attachment 595420 [details, diff] set EROOT.patch This should be helpful, please test.
Hello, It seems this patch works with =sys-libs/pam-1.3.0-r2, but it does not work with =sys-libs/pam-1.2.1-r2. BTW, =sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1 fails during compiling, which is not related to this bug. May I open a new bug and report the compile failure of =sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1?
(In reply to ZongyuZ from comment #4) > Hello, > > It seems this patch works with =sys-libs/pam-1.3.0-r2, but it does not > work with =sys-libs/pam-1.2.1-r2. > > > BTW, =sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1 fails during compiling, which is not related > to this bug. May I open a new bug and report the compile failure of > =sys-libs/pam-1.3.1-r1? This depends on what problem you have, say bug 695966 is still unclear to me. Also I have no idea why pam on prefix may be needed at all, might be only for ssh, but not sure.
(In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #5) > This depends on what problem you have, say bug 695966 is still unclear to > me. Also I have no idea why pam on prefix may be needed at all, might be > only for ssh, but not sure. I'm not sure either. USE="pam" was enabled and sys-libs/pam would be emerged when some other packages like openrc being emerged. So it seems this bug is resolved, as sys-libs/pam-1.3.0-r2 is already installed in my system with no error reported. Thank you very much! Would you merge your patch into gentoo? And am I the person who should mark this bug as resolved? Thank you for your help again!
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=e4fee95b96c9d684c3b992f7e154c9d12e6636ab commit e4fee95b96c9d684c3b992f7e154c9d12e6636ab Author: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-03-12 16:07:51 +0000 Commit: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-03-12 16:12:16 +0000 sys-libs/pam: Add prefix support Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/709924 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/699188 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/699526 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/695966 Thanks-to: Benda Xu <heroxbd@gentoo.org> Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.89, Repoman-2.3.20 Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@gentoo.org> sys-libs/pam/pam-1.3.1_p20200128.ebuild | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
