According to upstream (http://mumps.enseeiht.fr/doc/userguide_5.1.2.pdf, section 2.5.2 on page 9) for current mumps the latest version of scotch >=scotch-6.0.1 is recommended.
I closed the PR some time ago.
Due to upstream having updated to 5.2.1, the userguide is now at http://mumps.enseeiht.fr/doc/userguide_5.2.1.pdf. Information about dependency on scotch is now in section 2.6.2 on page 10. According to that, mumps (5.2.1) is compatible with scotch 5.1.x and 6.0.x, but not with 6.0.0, due to some problem with this version. They recommend, however, to use scotch >= 6.0.1.
This is blocking <sci-libs/scotch-6 cleanup.
I don't see any issues with the PR. @sci, I'll likely merge it if tests pass, if no objections?
It reports conflicts, looks like the in-tree version has changed since the PR was created.
(In reply to Bernd from comment #5) > It reports conflicts, looks like the in-tree version has changed since the > PR was created. I don't mind rebasing it.
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4a1cc44e67e78a4d2f507e585df4deea4a91cb81 commit 4a1cc44e67e78a4d2f507e585df4deea4a91cb81 Author: Bernd Waibel <waebbl@gmail.com> AuthorDate: 2019-09-15 16:18:51 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-09-18 16:21:14 +0000 sci-libs/mumps: update scotch dependency - Use >=sci-libs/scotch-6.0.1 for mumps as recommended by upstream - Re-order inherits - Bump to EAPI 7 - Fix missing / after ${EROOT} Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/670759 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.76, Repoman-2.3.17 Signed-off-by: Bernd Waibel <waebbl@gmail.com> Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12936 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> .../{mumps-5.1.2.ebuild => mumps-5.1.2-r1.ebuild} | 27 +++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
