Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 298528 - net-analyzer/munin installs Perl modules into site-dir (should go in vendor-dir)
Summary: net-analyzer/munin installs Perl modules into site-dir (should go in vendor-dir)
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Robin Johnson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: perl-sitedir
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-12-27 13:47 UTC by Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-07-19 22:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
munin-1.3.4-r3 ebuild patch (munin-1.3.4-r3.patch,610 bytes, patch)
2009-12-29 04:06 UTC, David Abbott (RETIRED)
Details | Diff
munin-1.3.4-Makefile-perlvendor.patch (munin-1.3.4-Makefile-perlvendor.patch,458 bytes, patch)
2009-12-29 04:08 UTC, David Abbott (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-27 13:47:43 UTC
* Tinderbox QA Warning! Perl files installed in site_dir
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Munin.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Munin
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Munin/Plugin
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Munin/Plugin.pm
Comment 1 David Abbott (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-29 04:06:45 UTC
Created attachment 214514 [details, diff]
munin-1.3.4-r3 ebuild patch
Comment 2 David Abbott (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-29 04:08:11 UTC
Created attachment 214515 [details, diff]
munin-1.3.4-Makefile-perlvendor.patch
Comment 3 David Abbott (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-29 04:11:28 UTC
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.1/Munin.pm
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.1/Munin/Plugin.pm
Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-02-03 15:21:53 UTC
A fix was applied to 1.4.3 in tree.
Comment 5 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-10 23:57:00 UTC
shouldn't this be marked closed then?
Comment 6 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-02-11 00:49:14 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> shouldn't this be marked closed then?
> 

I was going to wait until the affected versions were removed from the tree. But, I have no preference. I don't feel the need to be CC'd on this bug; removing myself.