Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 298528 - net-analyzer/munin installs Perl modules into site-dir (should go in vendor-dir)
Summary: net-analyzer/munin installs Perl modules into site-dir (should go in vendor-dir)
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Robin Johnson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: perl-sitedir
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-12-27 13:47 UTC by Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-07-19 22:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
munin-1.3.4-r3 ebuild patch (munin-1.3.4-r3.patch,610 bytes, patch)
2009-12-29 04:06 UTC, David Abbott (RETIRED) 		Details | Diff
munin-1.3.4-Makefile-perlvendor.patch (munin-1.3.4-Makefile-perlvendor.patch,458 bytes, patch)
2009-12-29 04:08 UTC, David Abbott (RETIRED) 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-27 13:47:43 UTC 
* Tinderbox QA Warning! Perl files installed in site_dir
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Munin.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Munin
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Munin/Plugin
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Munin/Plugin.pm
Comment 1 David Abbott (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-29 04:06:45 UTC 
Created attachment 214514 [details, diff]
munin-1.3.4-r3 ebuild patch
Comment 2 David Abbott (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-29 04:08:11 UTC 
Created attachment 214515 [details, diff]
munin-1.3.4-Makefile-perlvendor.patch
Comment 3 David Abbott (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-29 04:11:28 UTC 
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.1/Munin.pm
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.1/Munin/Plugin.pm
Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-02-03 15:21:53 UTC 
A fix was applied to 1.4.3 in tree.
Comment 5 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-10 23:57:00 UTC 
shouldn't this be marked closed then?
Comment 6 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-02-11 00:49:14 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> shouldn't this be marked closed then?
> 

I was going to wait until the affected versions were removed from the tree. But, I have no preference. I don't feel the need to be CC'd on this bug; removing myself.