Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 96348 - amule 2.0.3 released
Summary: amule 2.0.3 released
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 95104
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 96846 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-06-17 01:13 UTC by Miguel Latorre García
Modified: 2005-06-23 05:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
New ebuild for amule-2.0.3 (amule-2.0.3.ebuild,2.80 KB, text/plain)
2005-06-17 01:15 UTC, Miguel Latorre García 		Details
amule-2.0.3.ebuild (amule-2.0.3.tar,20.00 KB, application/x-tar)
2005-06-23 05:36 UTC, Pedro Algarvio 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Miguel Latorre García 2005-06-17 01:13:26 UTC 
New ebuild for amule 2.0.3:
- update from wxGTK 2.6.0 (dead) to wxGTK 2.6.0-r1

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Miguel Latorre García 2005-06-17 01:15:16 UTC 
Created attachment 61373 [details]
New ebuild for amule-2.0.3
Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-17 01:15:49 UTC 
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 95104 ***

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 95104 ***
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-23 04:11:06 UTC 
*** Bug 96846 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Pedro Algarvio 2005-06-23 05:36:20 UTC 
Created attachment 61777 [details]
amule-2.0.3.ebuild

- Added extra USEfull flags;
- Init.d Scripts
Comment 5 Pedro Algarvio 2005-06-23 05:38:58 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 95104 ***
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 95104 ***

If it's a duplicate then change, Bug 95104 sumary to amule 2.0.x ebuild. This
way, it would be a duplicate...