Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 936397 - mail-filter/couriersrs: removal
Summary: mail-filter/couriersrs: removal
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Deadline: 2024-08-19
Assignee: Hanno Böck
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: PMASKED
Depends on:
Blocks: 715284 832000
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2024-07-20 12:24 UTC by Arthur Zamarin
Modified: 2024-07-20 15:29 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Arthur Zamarin archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-07-20 12:24:09 UTC
EAPI=6 package, no reverse dependencies, not maintained in Gentoo for
a long time. Has multiple issues with musl.

package list:
mail-filter/couriersrs
Comment 1 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2024-07-20 12:28:08 UTC
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=5cdddd7206c273480c26c8139b7aa36136860d7c

commit 5cdddd7206c273480c26c8139b7aa36136860d7c
Author:     Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2024-07-20 12:25:15 +0000
Commit:     Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2024-07-20 12:27:49 +0000

    mail-filter/couriersrs: last-rite
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/936397
    Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>

 profiles/package.mask | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Comment 2 Hanno Böck gentoo-dev 2024-07-20 15:15:50 UTC
Erh, wait, stop. Could you please not package.mask packages without contacting the listed maintainer before?

It is maintained. I wasn't aware that I have a package where I need to care about an EAPI bump, but you could've opened a bug for that. Ideally *before* p.masking.

That it doesn't compile with a non-standard libc isn't a reason to treeclean it.
Comment 3 Arthur Zamarin archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-07-20 15:19:14 UTC
(In reply to Hanno Böck from comment #2)
> Erh, wait, stop. Could you please not package.mask packages without
> contacting the listed maintainer before?
> 
> It is maintained. I wasn't aware that I have a package where I need to care
> about an EAPI bump, but you could've opened a bug for that. Ideally *before*
> p.masking.

This is indeed the main reason, EAPI=6. This was a way to contact directly maintainers, after I've sent emails, we notified it on gentoo-dev ML, and pinged on IRC. If you handle the EAPI bump, I've no issues with you un-last-rite.

This last-rite is a way to detect where the maintainer have just forgotten the package, nothing against you. Since you clearly care about it (with such fast response), sorry for the way it ended.

> That it doesn't compile with a non-standard libc isn't a reason to treeclean
> it.

musl issues are of lesser importance to me, non-blocker. I've just mentioned it here.
Comment 4 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2024-07-20 15:28:40 UTC
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s):

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=2848be3fb5b0f4178419970401253a27c67fefd0

commit 2848be3fb5b0f4178419970401253a27c67fefd0
Author:     Hanno Böck <hanno@gentoo.org>
AuthorDate: 2024-07-20 15:28:15 +0000
Commit:     Hanno Böck <hanno@gentoo.org>
CommitDate: 2024-07-20 15:28:15 +0000

    profiles: unmask couriersrs
    
    Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/936397
    Signed-off-by: Hanno Böck <hanno@gentoo.org>

 profiles/package.mask | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)