936288 – CDN/bouncer inconsistency for binpkgs between Packages index and binpkgs themselves

Bug 936288 - CDN/bouncer inconsistency for binpkgs between Packages index and binpkgs themselves

Summary: CDN/bouncer inconsistency for binpkgs between Packages index and binpkgs them...

Status:	CONFIRMED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Infrastructure
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Other (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	Normal normal
Assignee:	Gentoo Infrastructure

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2024-07-19 08:09 UTC by Sam James
Modified:	2024-07-19 08:26 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:	936287 936286 936289
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Sam James archtester

2024-07-19 08:09:44 UTC

As described at https://bugs.gentoo.org/936287#c0, this is 2) for the infra side.

"""
2) On the infra side, there's inconsistency between the host which serves us the binhost Packages index vs the binpkgs themselves.

This manifests often as:
```
>>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-apps/portage-3.0.65-r1
--2024-07-19 08:00:16--  https://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/gentoo/releases/amd64/binpackages/23.0/x86-64/sys-apps/portage/portage-3.0.65-r1-1.gpkg.tar
Resolving mirror.bytemark.co.uk... 2001:41c8:20:5fc::13, 2001:41c8:20:5e6::150, 80.68.83.150, ...
Connecting to mirror.bytemark.co.uk|2001:41c8:20:5fc::13|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2024-07-19 08:00:16 ERROR 404: Not Found.
```
"""

Comment 1 Sam James archtester

2024-07-19 08:26:31 UTC

I should've really used bouncer.gentoo.org (or distfiles.gentoo.org?) here as the bytemark thing is seemingly something else (bug 936289).