Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 926681 - media-sound/frescobaldi depends on dev-qt/qtwebengine:5 via dev-python/PyQtWebEngine
Summary: media-sound/frescobaldi depends on dev-qt/qtwebengine:5 via dev-python/PyQtWe...
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Gentoo Sound Team
URL: https://github.com/frescobaldi/fresco...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 939130
Blocks: qtwebengine5-removal 926684
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2024-03-10 10:08 UTC by Andreas Sturmlechner
Modified: 2024-09-05 18:02 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2024-03-10 10:08:09 UTC
Hopefully they will make it sooner than later.
Comment 1 N. Andrew Walsh 2024-04-29 09:18:20 UTC
I'm talking to the lilypond-list mailing list, and seeing if we can get anybody to work on the update. So far, not much luck. 

This is now somewhat urgent, as snappy's recent update means older versions of qtwebengine (notably, version -5.15.13_p20240322 that's currently in the tree) won't work with it. See this bug on FreeBSD's bugzilla: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278633

Updating frescobaldi to work with PyQt6 involves work that it's beyond my skills to know how to do, but I hope we can get this looked at. Lilypond is *the* music-notation software for Linux, and frescobaldi is *the* IDE for it.
Comment 2 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2024-05-15 19:43:29 UTC
(In reply to N. Andrew Walsh from comment #1)
> This is now somewhat urgent, as snappy's recent update means older versions
> of qtwebengine (notably, version -5.15.13_p20240322 that's currently in the
> tree) won't work with it. See this bug on FreeBSD's bugzilla:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278633
That seems to have been just a downstream packaging mishap, at least I cannot reproduce it (and someone else would have complained by now).
Comment 3 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2024-09-05 18:02:17 UTC
Yeah, that looks like the usual snappy ABI break shenanigans. We sorted that out on our end already.