https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/commit/850029cd688155a04991595be58e4adffc9ba183 "CMakeLists: Default QT6 to ON" Please add QT6 dependencies and a QT5 USE flag to the ebuild. -DQT6="$(usex QT5 off on)" #-DQT6=OFF if QT5 enabled qml could also be interesting to enable.
https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/3429 https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/commit/bea2be9ae78ddb5e8474072dbe6746befb575817
Turns out 2.4-beta and 2.4 branch is a thing. It still supports Qt5, so in a first step, if not providing Qt6, looking at ebuilds without dev-qt/qtscript:5 would be nice.
I think 2.4-beta is to old with date of May. Most of the commits go first into 2.4 branch and then into main. I have the feeling a 2.4 release is near. https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/projects/3 The 2.3 Branch development seems dead with last commit in August when 2.3.6 was released. -mixxx-2.3.9999.ebuild +mixxx-2.4.9999.ebuild
https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/commit/94dde618a4e5448c92a24fe77f4ec22a3ef4f7ea Looks like they want to support qt6 officially in 2.5.
https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/commit/3f0045b5924131d7664a75ff42e490ed6ef04848 "add qt6-qpa-plugins to dependencies main"
(In reply to Alfred Wingate from comment #4) > https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/commit/ > 94dde618a4e5448c92a24fe77f4ec22a3ef4f7ea > > Looks like they want to support qt6 officially in 2.5. We need something that can be stabilised and Qt6-based software will not make that cut for a while.
(In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #6) > (In reply to Alfred Wingate from comment #4) > > https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/commit/ > > 94dde618a4e5448c92a24fe77f4ec22a3ef4f7ea > > > > Looks like they want to support qt6 officially in 2.5. > We need something that can be stabilised and Qt6-based software will not > make that cut for a while. There you have it: https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/releases/tag/2.4.0 "Mixxx 2.4 does not fully support Qt6, use 2.5/main instead. " "Qt6 support is available for CI checks only and requires the environment variable GITHUB_ACTIONS to be set." I will try to convert the live ebuild to qt6.
Created attachment 885362 [details, diff] mixxx-9999.ebuild_qt6.patch Works with qt6. I did not test with qt5. Experimental QML gui also works. The resulting mixxx-9999.ebuild could also work for mixxx-2.4 . You could set qt5 USEflag to +qt5 then. Would be nice if we could solve Bug 822357 to get rid of the tests and benchmark builds and dependencies.
Miroslav, what is you opinion? Would you like to merge the patch?
Your patch lacks a bit of alphanumerical sorting and there's at least one error: > !qt5? ( qtkeychain? ( dev-libs/qtkeychain:=[qt6(+)] ) ) ...means that Qt6 functionality will be assumed even in *older* versions of qtkeychain that did not have the flag.
plus it is highly unlikely that dev-cpp/gtest and dev-cpp/benchmark are RDEPENDs.
Created attachment 885914 [details] mixxx-9999.ebuild sorted the deps It is hard for me to decide whether they are build depends or also run depends and why dev-cpp/ms-gsl is in DEPEND. Should the cmake args also be sorted? By cmake option? I think now they are sorted by appearance in cmakelist.txt or logical and a little alphanumerical/USEflags. I'll attach an ebuild.patch again when all is good.
Should I add something like --prefix= or ${ED} for the insinto ?
Created attachment 887644 [details] mixxx-9999.ebuild added dep on dev-qt/qtshadertools https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/commit/bdb6630669edf8aefe9a5f9eb5dda1ecbb812c9f and dev-qt/qt5compat
Maybe we need to restrict mixxx to <qt-6.7 until upstream or we have have a patch.
(In reply to jospezial from comment #15) > Maybe we need to restrict mixxx to <qt-6.7 until upstream or we have have a > patch. https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/releases/tag/2.4.1 That was released in May and fixes the qt-6.7 bug.
Good build! Thanks for the hard work. I tested with all flags enabled except doc and qt5. Help -> About -> Git Version 2.6-alpha-83-gcf82b35ea6-modified (HEAD) I tried to build the 2.4.1 point release too and saw the same message from comment #7. Regardless, I did have to add a little bit of a patch when I was trying to use a 2.4.1 ebuild because ${S} is different. --- mixxx-9999.ebuild 2024-09-06 05:07:52.344069547 +0000 +++ mixxx-2.4.1-r2.ebuild 2024-09-06 05:15:13.383797121 +0000 @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ EGIT_REPO_URI="https://github.com/mixxxdj/${PN}.git" else SRC_URI="https://github.com/mixxxdj/${PN}/archive/release-${PV}.tar.gz -> ${P}.tar.gz" - S="${WORKDIR}/${PN}-release-${PV}" + S="${WORKDIR}/${PN}-${PV}" KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86" fi I have not tried a 2.5.9999 and am pretty happy HEAD builds and runs. Thanks!!
(In reply to Chicago from comment #17) > Good build! Thanks for the hard work. I tested with all flags enabled except > doc and qt5. > > Help -> About -> Git Version 2.6-alpha-83-gcf82b35ea6-modified (HEAD) > > I tried to build the 2.4.1 point release too and saw the same message from > comment #7. > > Regardless, I did have to add a little bit of a patch when I was trying to > use a 2.4.1 ebuild because ${S} is different. > > --- mixxx-9999.ebuild 2024-09-06 05:07:52.344069547 +0000 > +++ mixxx-2.4.1-r2.ebuild 2024-09-06 05:15:13.383797121 +0000 > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ > EGIT_REPO_URI="https://github.com/mixxxdj/${PN}.git" > else > > SRC_URI="https://github.com/mixxxdj/${PN}/archive/release-${PV}.tar.gz -> > ${P}.tar.gz" > - S="${WORKDIR}/${PN}-release-${PV}" > + S="${WORKDIR}/${PN}-${PV}" > KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86" > fi > > > I have not tried a 2.5.9999 and am pretty happy HEAD builds and runs. > > Thanks!! I notice SRC_URI is also wrong. "release" was from mixxx 2.2 time. Some changes that went into 2.3.x ::gentoo ebuilds in January 2022 (for example disabling the S= line and changed SRC_URI) have not found its way into 9999. We will have to compare and check which of these changes are still needed for live and latest releases.
mixxx-2.4.2 has been released.
