For parity with exa. No real harm in stabling it early given it's brand new (i.e. it can't regress wrt previous eza), and we're last-riting exa now anyway...
Sanity check failed: > sys-apps/eza-0.11.0 > bdepend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl (4 total) > >=virtual/rust-1.70.0 > bdepend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (18 total) > >=virtual/rust-1.70.0
The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=52e043ff71a07e901e107d4ef52bb7a393b01537 commit 52e043ff71a07e901e107d4ef52bb7a393b01537 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-09-11 00:56:11 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-09-11 00:56:11 +0000 profiles/arch: duplicate exa[man] masks for eza Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913960 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913961 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> profiles/arch/arm64/package.use.mask | 1 + profiles/arch/powerpc/ppc64/package.use.mask | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
(In reply to NATTkA bot from comment #1) > Sanity check failed: > > > sys-apps/eza-0.11.0 > > bdepend amd64 dev profile default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl (4 total) > > >=virtual/rust-1.70.0 > > bdepend amd64 stable profile default/linux/amd64/17.1 (18 total) > > >=virtual/rust-1.70.0 Pfff.
All sanity-check issues have been resolved
(In reply to NATTkA bot from comment #4) > All sanity-check issues have been resolved I've filed https://github.com/projg2/nattka/issues/83 for the seemingly odd (unless missing something obvious) nattka behaviour here. I feel like it shouldn't have actually cc'd amd64 yet.
Unable to check for sanity: > dependent bug #913962 has errors
Unable to check for sanity: > no match for package: sys-apps/eza-0.11.0
eza 0.11.1-r1 is stable on amd64, closing.