Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 910265 - gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.29.0: stabilisation
Summary: gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.29.0: stabilisation
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Gnustep project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: CC-ARCHES
Depends on:
Blocks: EAPI6Removal 913075 914484
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2023-07-12 15:38 UTC by elprawn
Modified: 2023-12-16 01:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
gnustep-base/gnustep-make-2.9.0 gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.29.0 amd64 ppc sparc x86 gnustep-base/gnustep-gui-0.29.0-r1 amd64 ppc sparc x86 gnustep-base/gnustep-back-art-0.29.0 amd64 ppc sparc x86 gnustep-base/gnustep-back-cairo-0.29.0 amd64 ppc sparc x86 gnustep-base/gnustep-back-xlib-0.29.0 amd64 ppc sparc x86 virtual/gnustep-back-0.29.0 amd64 ppc sparc x86
Runtime testing required: ---
nattka: sanity-check+

Attachments
Emerge log (gnustep-base.log,37.51 KB, text/plain)
2023-07-12 15:39 UTC, elprawn 		no flags Details
Emerge Info (emerge.info,7.85 KB, text/plain)
2023-07-12 15:40 UTC, elprawn 		no flags Details
tests.log.gz (tests.log.gz,108.02 KB, application/gzip)
2023-12-11 17:42 UTC, matoro 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description elprawn 2023-07-12 15:38:21 UTC 
gnustep-base fails to compile with libxml2-2.11.4. I am able to emerge successfully by masking libxml2-2.11.4 and installing libxml2-2.10.4

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge -1 =dev-libs/libxml2-2.11.4
2. emerge -1 =gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.27.0-r1
Comment 1 elprawn 2023-07-12 15:39:26 UTC 
Created attachment 865418 [details]
Emerge log
Comment 2 elprawn 2023-07-12 15:40:50 UTC 
Created attachment 865419 [details]
Emerge Info
Comment 3 elprawn 2023-07-12 15:43:40 UTC 
My apologies for the colour data in the build output. This was the build log as reported by emerge.
Comment 4 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-07-13 01:48:37 UTC 
voyageur: good to go?
Comment 5 Bernard Cafarelli gentoo-dev 2023-07-13 07:31:21 UTC 
Good to go, I add the whole gnustep-back/ set as this is how they are mostly running along (upstream and in Gentoo)
Comment 6 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-09-26 00:53:31 UTC 
bug 661998 isn't a regression.
Comment 7 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-09-26 00:54:02 UTC 
amd64 done
Comment 8 matoro archtester 2023-12-11 17:42:00 UTC 
Created attachment 878672 [details]
tests.log.gz

Tons of fails here at least on x86.
Comment 9 Bernard Cafarelli gentoo-dev 2023-12-12 07:51:27 UTC 
I had fixed test run in the ebuild a while ago but it seems to be broken again indeed. They do run fine manually:
/var/tmp/portage/gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.29.0/work/gnustep-base-1.29.0 % make -j32 check
[...]
   9538 Passed tests
     42 Dashed hopes
     15 Skipped sets

All OK!


versus test phase:
   8145 Passed tests
   1331 Failed tests
     47 Dashed hopes
     15 Skipped sets
     10 Failed files
      3 Failed sets
Comment 10 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-12-16 01:43:55 UTC 
ppc done
Comment 11 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-12-16 01:43:57 UTC 
ppc64 done
Comment 12 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-12-16 01:43:58 UTC 
sparc done
Comment 13 Sam James archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2023-12-16 01:43:59 UTC 
x86 done

all arches done