https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/ Issue: sys-fs/fatcat-1.1.1 fails to compile (MUSL-SYSTEM). Discovered on: amd64 (internal ref: tinderbox_musl) NOTE: (MUSL-SYSTEM) in the summary means that bug was found on a machine that runs MUSL libc but this bug MAY or MAY NOT BE related to musl.
Created attachment 863866 [details] build.log build log and emerge --info
Error(s) that match a know pattern in addition to what has been reported in the summary: FAILED: CMakeFiles/fatcat.dir/src/core/FatSystem.cpp.o /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/fatcat-1.1.1/work/fatcat-1.1.1/src/core/FatSystem.cpp:93:5: error: 'lseek64' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'lseek'?
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1afb1f2f7dfb2e4c1588fcb084f9879f3494f111 commit 1afb1f2f7dfb2e4c1588fcb084f9879f3494f111 Author: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2023-06-15 15:17:46 +0000 Commit: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2023-06-15 15:17:46 +0000 sys-fs/fatcat: new musl fix, replace old musl fix too We previously had 1 musl patch for getopt usage, I'm replacing that with one from an upstream PR [1], also adding a new patch from that upstream PR. [1] https://github.com/Gregwar/fatcat/pull/34 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/908541 Signed-off-by: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org> sys-fs/fatcat/fatcat-1.1.1.ebuild | 6 +- .../files/fatcat-1.1.1-musl-1.2.4-fixes.patch | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++ sys-fs/fatcat/files/fatcat-include-getopt.patch | 11 --- 3 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)