Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 908044 - stable request for DAHDI 3.2.0 packages
Summary: stable request for DAHDI 3.2.0 packages
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal major (vote)
Assignee: Jaco Kroon
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: CC-ARCHES, PMASKED, STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-06-08 06:24 UTC by Jaco Kroon
Modified: 2023-12-28 10:35 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
=net-misc/dahdi-tools-3.2.0 =net-misc/dahdi-3.2.0
Runtime testing required: No
nattka: sanity-check-

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jaco Kroon 2023-06-08 06:24:57 UTC 
Hi,

Not sure if it's been 30 days, but 3.1.0 is plainly broken against newer kernels, and 3.2.0 has been shown to compile at least.  Requesting immediate stable of the two 3.2.0 ebuilds.  Update to linux-mod-r1 to follow later and we'll stable that separately.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Joonas Niilola gentoo-dev 2023-06-08 08:11:05 UTC 
I'm running into bug 906179 it seems. 

cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
/var/tmp/portage/net-misc/dahdi-3.1.0-r3/work/dahdi-linux-3.1.0/drivers/dahdi/xpp/xpp_usb.c:1112:55: error: implicit declaration of function 'PDE_DATA'; did you mean 'NODE_DATA'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration[https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wimplicit-function-declaration]]
 1112 |         return single_open(file, xusb_read_proc_show, PDE_DATA(inode));
      |                                                       ^~~~~~~~
      |                                                       NODE_DATA


etc.
Comment 2 Jaco Kroon 2023-06-08 08:16:39 UTC 
Damn.  This environment nowadays is just too fast changing.  Going to need a few days, let's hold off on this one then.

Do we have a way of determining how many DAHDI users we still have out there, ideally short of masking net-misc/dahdi{,-tools}?  I've got one host and frankly, at this stage I'm considering spending the money to rather get a SIP2PRI gateway just to get rid of this mess.
Comment 3 NATTkA bot gentoo-dev 2023-09-21 08:20:18 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 Joonas Niilola gentoo-dev 2023-09-21 08:20:19 UTC 
Last-rited, please see bug #914477.
Comment 5 NATTkA bot gentoo-dev 2023-12-16 08:28:26 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 6 NATTkA bot gentoo-dev 2023-12-27 21:28:32 UTC 
Unable to check for sanity:

> package masked: net-misc/dahdi-tools-3.2.0
Comment 7 Jaco Kroon 2023-12-28 10:35:23 UTC 
Killing this since we cannot stable 3.2.0.