Hello, The package "net-analyzer/nettop" has its homepage pointing to the wiki link "No_homepage". This package's home is at (I'm forbidden from posting links in the 1st 24hrs) "https[remove_me]://[remove_me]nettop.youlink.[remove_me]org/" and there is also a newer version listed on there.
(In reply to sanomiad from comment #0) > Hello, > > The package "net-analyzer/nettop" has its homepage pointing to the wiki link > "No_homepage". This package's home is at (I'm forbidden from posting links > in the 1st 24hrs) > "https[remove_me]://[remove_me]nettop.youlink.[remove_me]org/" and there is > also a newer version listed on there. I've checked the original sources and those of your link. While both share the same name, i don't think these are the same packages. They're quite different in their content (one is written in C the other one in C++) Maybe the old one can be replaced, but a simple change of the HOMEPAGE probably won't be sufficient.
(In reply to Michael Mair-Keimberger (iamnr3) from comment #1) > (In reply to sanomiad from comment #0) > > Hello, > > > > The package "net-analyzer/nettop" has its homepage pointing to the wiki link > > "No_homepage". This package's home is at (I'm forbidden from posting links > > in the 1st 24hrs) > > "https[remove_me]://[remove_me]nettop.youlink.[remove_me]org/" and there is > > also a newer version listed on there. > > I've checked the original sources and those of your link. While both share > the same name, i don't think these are the same packages. They're quite > different in their content (one is written in C the other one in C++) > Maybe the old one can be replaced, but a simple change of the HOMEPAGE > probably won't be sufficient. Confirmed. Are there any plans to create a landing page for this utility? And where can we browse or obtain the source code?
package maintainers need to update the ebuild with a proper homerpage and a link to the source code.
(In reply to sanomiad from comment #3) > package maintainers need to update the ebuild with a proper homerpage and a > link to the source code. Uh, that's not a WONTFIX.
(In reply to Sam James from comment #4) > (In reply to sanomiad from comment #3) > > package maintainers need to update the ebuild with a proper homerpage and a > > link to the source code. > > Uh, that's not a WONTFIX. Well, it's been sitting here for about 10 months. I'd fix this myself but no one is providing the necessary info/guide to do so.
