Bug 882713 – dev-libs/newt-0.52.22: whiptcl.c:150:9: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘Tcl_SetResultString’; did you mean ‘Tcl_SetResult’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Andrey Grozin 2022-11-24 11:31:50 UTC]

Created attachment 836315 [details]
build log

>>> Completed installing dev-libs/newt-0.52.22 into /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/newt-0.52.22/image

 * Final size of build directory: 10464 KiB (10.2 MiB)
 * Final size of installed tree:    884 KiB

 * Verifying compiled files for python3.10
 * Verifying compiled files for python3.11
 * Verifying compiled files for python3.9
 * 
 * QA Notice: Package triggers severe warnings which indicate that it
 *            may exhibit random runtime failures.
 * 
 * whiptcl.c:150:9: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘Tcl_SetResultString’; did you mean ‘Tcl_SetResult’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
 * 
 *  Please file a bug about this at https://bugs.gentoo.org/
 *  with the maintainer of the package.
 * 
 * ERROR: dev-libs/newt-0.52.22::gentoo failed:
 *   install aborted due to severe warnings shown above
 * 
 * Call stack:
 *   misc-functions.sh, line 670:  Called install_qa_check
 *   misc-functions.sh, line 134:  Called source 'install_symlink_html_docs'
 *      90gcc-warnings, line 197:  Called gcc_warn_check
 *      90gcc-warnings, line 183:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *                              die "install aborted due to severe warnings shown above"

bilbo ~ # emerge -pqv '=dev-libs/newt-0.52.22::gentoo'
[ebuild     U ] dev-libs/newt-0.52.22 [0.52.21_p20210816] USE="gpm nls tcl" PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_9 python3_10 python3_11 -python3_8"

[Comment 1 Sam James 2022-11-24 11:38:12 UTC]

FWIW, I've yanked this check from Portage for now, but will be restoring it in the near future, so if you upgrade Portage, you should be able to install this package.

But the error/warning is still valid here.

[Comment 2 Andreas K. Hüttel 2024-10-21 21:30:55 UTC]

Is tis fixed in 0.52.24 ?

[Comment 3 Ben Kohler 2024-10-22 12:47:03 UTC]

As far as I can see, yes