readline? ( dev-libs/libedit ) should be readline? ( dev-libs/readline ) Reproducible: Always
readline? ( dev-libs/libedit ) should be readline? ( sys-libs/readline )
No, it's right. We have a tendency to reuse the same name for features. https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c02869eecf10098e7a8622a95448f0cc9d973ac0
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > No, it's right. > > We have a tendency to reuse the same name for features. > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/ > ?id=c02869eecf10098e7a8622a95448f0cc9d973ac0 I built fine chrony without libedit
Then turn off USE=readline?
In case haven't seen it and still unclear, the ebuild has this comment explaining it: # USE=readline here means "readline-like functionality" # chrony only supports libedit in terms of the library providing # it. $(usev !readline '--without-editline --disable-readline') ./configure only tests editline/readline.h rather than readline/readline.h: if test_code editline 'stdio.h editline/readline.h' '' '-ledit' So as mentioned above, if you don't want readline-like functionality using libedit, just disable USE=readline because you're not using sys-libs/readline either way (no support).